BASES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORIES OF INFORMATION PERCEPTION
The possibility for classification of psychological theories of visual information perception are investigated with the aim to define the applicable limits for each approach. The perception of visual information is seen as part of the information process (generation, coding, storage, transfer of information, etc.). The information process interpreted within the context of post-non-classical paradigm (V. S. Stepin). This kind of perception interpretation corresponds to the methodology of information-synergetic approach developed by I. V. Melik-Gaykazyan. Therefore, the main theses and models of information- synergetic approach are chosen as bases for the classification of psychological theories of visual information perception. Some results of the of the RFBR project № 14-06-00440; of project no. 155 “Methodology of modeling of semiotic mechanisms of management of nonlinear dynamics educational systems” of the State assignment for Tomsk State Pedagogical University are presented.
Keywords: visual information, perception of visual information, post-non-classical paradigm, synergetics, information-synergetic approach
References:
1. Pervushina N. A. The effectiveness of visual learning: the defi nition of boundaries. Higher education in Russia, 2013, no. 2, pp. 119–124 (in Russian).
2. Pervushina N. A. The approach for regulation the perception of visual information processes and the role of museum in modern culture. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 11 (139), pp. 167–172 (in Russian).
3. Funch B. S. The Psychology of Art Appreciation. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen. 1997. V. XII. 312 p.
4. Torshilova E. M., Dukarevich M. Z. Aesthetic perception of painting and the structure of the personality. The creative process and aesthetic perception. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1978. Pp. 174–190 (in Russian).
5. Dadamyan G., Dondurey D., Nevler L. Perception of monumental art types, mechanisms, effectiveness. Problems in sociological research. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. Pp. 194–248 (in Russian).
6. Belonogova E. V., Leontiev D. A. Synthetic model of art perception. Psychological Journal, 2001, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 140–142 (in Russian).
7. Stepin V. S. The change of types of scientifi c rationality. Synergetics and Psychology. Texts. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2003. Pp. 167–172 (in Russian).
8. Stepin V. S. Theoretical knowledge. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2003. 744 p. (in Russian).
9. Stepin V. S., Kuznetsova L. F. Scientifi c picture of the world in the culture of the technogenic civilization. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. 274 p. (in Russian).
10. Knyazeva H. N., Kurdyumov S. P. Foundatioms of synergetic: blow-up regimes, self-organization, tempoworlds. St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2002. 274 p. (in Russian).
11. Kuhta M. S. The perception of visual information: philosophy of process. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tomskogo gos. ped. un-ta Publ., 2004. 202 p. (in Russian).
12. Gorbuleva M. S. Phenomenon of the memory and its role in marginal subcultures. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 11, pp. 188–193 (in Russian).
13. Gorbuleva M. S. Memory-turn and a bioethics content of a symbols of modern culture. Tomsk State University Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2012, no. 4, pp. 157–164 (in Russian).
14. Vygotsky L. S. The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A Methodological Investigation. The Collected Works of Vygotsky. Vol. 1. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1982. 488 p. (in Russian).
15. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V., Melik-Gaykazyan M. V., Tarasenko V. F. Methodology of Nonlinear Dynamics Modelling of Complex Systems. Moscow, Fizmatlit Publ., 2001. 272 p. (in Russian).
16. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V., Rogotneva E. N. Border in the educational space. Philosophy of Education, 2005, no. 3 (in Russian).
17. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Modeling educational systems: a research program. Higher education in Russia, 2008, no. 9, pp. 89–94 (in Russian).
18. Matveeva O. Yu., Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Model of time perception in sociocultural systems. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2008, no. 1, pp. 63–68 (in Russian).
19. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Memory-turn: architecture of bioethics as diagnostics of a new turn of philosophy. Tomsk State University Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2012, no. 4, pp. 165–179 (in Russian).
20. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Diagnosis of memory-turn or bioethics measurement problems of vocational education. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, vol. 4 (119), pp. 244–247 (in Russian).
21. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Memory turn: manifested by bioethics the frailty of intellectual traditions. Ideas and Ideals, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1 (15), pp. 49–63 (in Russian).
22. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Semiotic diagnostics: Method of measuring the Selfi shness of Power. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 9 (137), pp. 255–261 (in Russian).
( 402.05 kB ) 
( 396.1 kB )
Issue: 7, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 7
Rubric: METHODOLOGY OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Pages: 94 — 98
Downloads: 786