PERIKHORESIS AND SELFNESS AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL STRATEGY IN CHRISTIAN CULTURAL TRADITION
Two antropological strategies (selfness and perichoresis) represented in the Christian culture are comparatively analyzed. It is claimed that these anthropological strategies are conceivable only in the personalistic paradigm, according to which a person a self-identical reality, a “center” capable of “anthropological openness” perceived as constitutive disconnection – forming person's constitution, person's identity structure as an anthropological topos, made with the sum of person's communicative acts.
Keywords: person, human, Christian culture, anthropological strategies, synergy anthropology, anthropological opening
References:
1. Meyendorff I. F. Life and labours of Saint Gregory Palamas: introduction and studies. St. Petersburg, Vizantinorossika Publ., 1997. 497 p. (in Russain).
2. Khoruzhiy S. S. The constitution of personality and identity in a perspective based on practices of the self: old and new. Problems of Philosophy, 2007, no.1, pp. 75–85 (in Russain).
3. Soloviev V. S. The meaning of love. Works. In 2 vol. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1998. Vol. 2. Pp. 493–547 (in Russian).
4. St. Theophan the Recluse. The Path to Salvation. The asceticism outline. Christian preachment description. Moscow, Blagovest Publ., 2001. 368 p. (in Russain).
5. Khoruzhiy S. S. “There are some strange overlaps”: Patandzhali, Palamas, Kierkegaard as forerunners of disconnection anthropology. Problems of Philosophy. 2011, no 5, pp. 41–45 (in Russain).
6. Volkova L. D., Karavaeva E. V. Hesychasm as Part of Russian Orthodox Culture. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 5, pp. 21–28 (in Russain).
7. Davydenkov O. Dogmatic theology. Moscow, PSTGU Publ., 2006. 435 p. (in Russain).
Issue: 7, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 7
Rubric: PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF RELIGION
Pages: 65 — 67
Downloads: 855