PRINCIPLE OF RESPECT FOR PATIENT'S AUTONOMY IN DIFFERENT CULTURAL CONTEXTS
In the article results of research of different kinds of patient's autonomy in regard of definite cultures are reflected. Research have been conducted under support of RFH (project № 12-03-00198 “Bioethics as a Phenomenon of Selfconsciousness of Modern Culture”).
Keywords: bioethics, autonomy of the patient, Confucian ethics, paternalism
References:
1. Meshcheryakova T. V., Gerasimova O. V. The change of generations or the problem of shaping the awareness value of future doctors. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 11 (139), pp. 179–187 (in Russian).
2. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Semiotic diagnostics: Method of measuring the Selfi shness of Power. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 9 (137), pp. 255–261 (in Russian).
3. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Intelligent interior, the idea of the process and the measurement problem. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2009, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 127–141. (in Russian).
4. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Measurement of a Dream to Lewis Caroll’s Rule. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 10, pp. 202–208 (in Russian).
5. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Impact of a changing world as an information process. Human, 2007, no. 3, pp. 32–43 (in Russian).
6. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Memory turn: manifested by bioethics the frailty of intellectual traditions. Ideas and Ideals, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1 (15), pp. 49–63 (in Russian).
7. Bartko A. N., Mikhailovska-Karlova E. P. Biomedical ethics: theory, principles and problems. Part 2. Principles and Generic Problems of Biomedical Ethics. Moscow, MMSI Publ., 1999. 225 p. (in Russian).
8. O'Neill O. Autonomy: Dependence and Independence. URL: http://www.portalus.ru/modules/philosophy/print.php?subaction=showfull&id=1108466140&archive=0216&start_from=&ucat=1& (Accessed: 13.03.2014) (in Russian).
9. Jьrgen Habermas. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Suhrkamp. 2001. (Russ. ed.: Buduscheye chelovecheskoy Prirody. Per. s nem M.Kharkova. Moscow, Ves' Mir Publ., 2002. 144 p.)
10. Tsai F.-C. D. How Should Doctors Approach Patients? A Confucian Refl ection On Personhood. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2001, vol. 27, pp. 44–50.
11. Tao Julia Lai Po-wah. A Confucian Approach To A “Shared Family Decision Model” In Health Care: Refl ections On Moral Pluralism. Global Bioethics: The Collapse of Consensus. Edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. Rice University, Houston, 2006, pp. 154–179.
12. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. (Russ. ed.: Osnovy metafi ziki nravstvennosti. Per. s nem S. Sheinman. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1999. 1472 p.)
13. Mill J. S. Utilitarianism. On Liberty. (Russ. ed.: O svobode. Utilitarinizm. Saint-Petersburg, Tipografi ya A. M. Kotomina Publ., 1882. 387 p.)
14. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Linda L. Emanuel. Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association. April 22, 1992, vol. 267, no. 16, pp. 2221–2226.
15. Schwab A. P. Formal and Effective Autonomy In Healthcare. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2006, vol. 32, pp. 575–579.
16. Tishchenko P. D. Bioethics: Autonomy of Will And Power (from Kant To Foucault). Workbooks on Biothics. Vol. 1. Bioethics: Anthropological Issues. Moscow, Humanitarian University Publ., 2006. URL: http://www.mosgu.ru/nauchnaya/publications/collections/Bioethics_notebooks_1/ (Accessed: 29.03.2014) (in Russian).
17. Tangwa G. B. Between Universalism And Relativism: A Conceptual Exploration Of Problems In Formulating And Applying International Biomedical Ethical Guidelines. Journal of Medical Ethics, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 63–67.
18. Bayertz K. Struggling for Consensus and Living Without It: The Construction of a Common European Bioethics. Global Bioethics: The Collapse of Consensus. Edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. Rice University, Houston, 2006, pp. 207–237.
( 436.03 kB ) 
( 428.42 kB )
Issue: 7, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 7
Rubric: PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF CONTEMPORARY CULTURAL STUDIES
Pages: 45 — 52
Downloads: 953