PARADOXES OF RELATIONS OF BIOETHICS AND BIOMEDICINE: TECHNOLOGY OF “ANIMAGS” CREATION
The article explores contradictions in bioethics and biomedicine in respect of trial subjects on the eample of animals and artificially created beings (genetically modified animals, interspecific hybrids, chimeras). The importance of rethinking the problem of standing and status of the discussed beings as philosophical and anthropological, as well as in ethical and legal dimensions of contemporary culture is actualised. Investigations were carried out with the support of RFH grant № 12-03-00198.
Keywords: bioethics, biomedicine, animagl, hybrides, chimeras, trial subject protection, principles of bioethics, animals in experiment
References:
1. Meshcheryakova T. V. Bioethics at intersection of scientifi c and extra-scientifi c areas. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 10 (112), pp. 216–221 (in Russian).
2. Gorbuleva M. S. Memory-turn and bioethical content symbols of modern culture. Tomsk State University Bulletin, 2012, no. 4 (20), pp. 158–164 (in Russian).
3. Singer P. Animal Liberation. London, Jonathan Cape Publ., 1990. 302 p.
4. Singer P. Animal Liberation. New York, 1975. Center for Protection of Animal Rights “Vita”, translated into Russian, 2009. URL: http :/ / www.vita.org.ru / library / philosophy / singer_animal_liberation.htm.
5. Regan T. Defending animal rights. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago, 2001. 179 p.
6. Regan T. The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, 1985. 425 p.
7. Pavlova T. N. Bioethics in higher school: tutorial. Moscow, Mosk. Gos. Akad. Vet. Meditsiny i biotekhnologii Publ., 1997. 147 p. (in Russian).
8. Kozhevnikova M. Problems of human nature in the context of the development of biotechnology. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of philosophical sciences. Moscow, 2013. 30 p. (in Russian).
9. Rowling J. K. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. Moscow, Rosman-Press Publ., 2002. 572 p. (in Russian).
10. Martin J. R. R. Game of Throne. Moscow, AST, Astrel Publ., 2011. 768 p. (in Russian).
11. Pullman F. His Dark Materials. Moscow, Rosman-Press, 2007. 1520 p. (in Russian).
12. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Memory turn: manifested by bioethics the frailty of intellectual traditions. Ideas and Ideals, 2013, vol. 1, no. 1 (15), pp. 49–63 (in Russian).
13. Matveeva O. Y., Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Model of time perception in sociocultural systems. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2008, no. 1, pp. 63–68 (in Russian).
14. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Intelligent interior, the idea of the process and the measurement problem. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2009, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 127–141. (in Russian).
15. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Semiotic diagnostics: Method of measuring the Selfi shness of Power. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 9 (137), pp. 255–261 (in Russian).
( 415.31 kB ) 
( 408.34 kB )
Issue: 7, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 7
Rubric: PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF CONTEMPORARY CULTURAL STUDIES
Pages: 9 — 15
Downloads: 888