MESOKOSMOS AND ANTROPOKOSMOS: COGNITIVE, ONTOLOGIC, AESTHETIC ASPECTS
Mesokosmos by G. Vollmer who has put into circulation this concept, – is a cognitive niche of the person. It is the world of middle dimensions, middle sizes and the speeds, which our brain perceives by means of sense organs and for which the person is evolutionary adapted. But with development of culture the person overcomes close borders of mesokosmos by means the thought, creating the new human world. For a designation of this world we enter new concept – antropokosmos. Mesokosmos and antropokosmos are in complex relations of a part and whole as partially mesokosmos enters in antropokosmos and is in some aspects the base to construction of antropokosmos.
Keywords: mesokosmos, antropokosmos, evolution, consciousness, consciousness phenomena, constructivism
References:
1. Follmer G. The evolutionary theory of knowledge. To the nature of human cognition. (Russ. ed.: Foll’mer G. Evolutsionnaya teoria poznania. K prirode chelovecheskogo poznania. Per. s nem. E. N. Knyazeva. Evalutsionnaya epistemiologia. Antologia. Moscow, Tsentr gumanitarnikh initsiativ Publ., 2012. Pp. 195, 198–199, 200.)
2. Follmer G. Evolution and projection. Beginning of the modern theory of knowledge. (Russ. ed.: Foll’mer G. Evolutsiya I proyektsiya. Nachala sovremennoy teorii poznania. Per. E. N. Knyazeva. Evolutsionnaya Epistemiologia. Antologia. Moscow, Tsenter gumanitarnikh initsiativ Publ., 2012. P. 211.)
3. Follmer G. On opposite sides of mesocosm. (Russ. ed.: Foll’mer G. Po raznie storoni mezokosma. Per. E. N. Knyazeva. Evolutsionnaya Epistemiologia. Antologia. Moscow, Tsenter gumanitarnikh initsiativ Publ., 2012. Pp. 231, 233.
4. Vernadsky V. I. Scientifi c Thought as a planetary phenomenon. Philosophical thoughts of Naturalist. Moscow, Academic Project, Kirov. Konstanta Publ., 2013. P. 26 (in Russian).
5. Knyazeva E. N. Enaktivny mind: a new constructivist paradigm in cognitive science. Psychology and Psycho, 2010. Pp. 16–26 (in Russian).
6. Pamuk O. My name is red. St. Petersburg, Amfora. TID Amfora Publ., 2011. P. 220 (in Russian).
7. Yum D. The study of human cognition. Moscow, 2009. P. 23 (in Russian).
8. Schutz A. Methodology of social sciences. Selected works: The world, glowing with sense. (Russ. ed.: Shuts A. Metodologiya sotsialnikh hauk. Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyashchiysiya smislom. Per. s angl.iI nem. Moscow, Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (ROSSPEN), 2004. pp. 13–14.)
9. Grigorieva T. P. Japanese artistic tradition. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. Pp. 211, 208 (in Russian).
10. Knyazeva E. N. Autopoiesis of thought. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2008, vol. 1 (75), p. 47 (in Russian).
11. Beskova I. A., Knyazeva E.N., Beskova D.A. Nature and images of corporeality. Moscow, Progress-Traditsia Publ., 2011. Pp. 329, 418 (in Russian).
12. Nietzsche F. Gay Science. Works in two volumes, Vol. 1. Moscow, Misl’ Publ., 1990. P. 495. (in Russian).
13. Derrida Zh. Geschlecht II: Heidegger’s Hand. Heidegger M. What Is Called Thinking? Moscow, Tettitoria Budushchego Publ., 2006. P. 282 (in Russian).
14. Polani M. Personal knowledge. Moscow, ProgressPubl., 1985. Pp. 88, 95 (in Russian).
( 452.62 kB ) 
( 445.34 kB )
Issue: 9, 2013
Series of issue: Issue 9
Rubric: INTERDISCIPLINARY MESSAGES
Pages: 282 — 290
Downloads: 1229