TROLLING AS A FORM OF SPEECH AGGRESSION IN INTERNET COMMUNICATION (ON THE MATERIAL OF THE SCHOOL COMMUNITY IN THE SOCIAL NETWORK)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-4-48-56
Introduction. The article examines one of the forms of speech aggression presented in Internet communication. Trolling is a phenomenon that develops along with new Internet technologies, is characteristic exclusively of network discourse and is embodied in provocative remarks. Trolling is a form of speech aggression, it is due to the nature of the Internet discourse. The purpose of the article is to study trolling as one of the forms of speech aggression in Internet communication. Material and methods. The material was publications and comments in the community of Russian schoolchildren on the Vkontakte social network. Discourse analysis became the main method. When selecting the material, the method of continuous sampling was applied. Results and discussion. The article actualizes the manifestation of speech aggression in the network communication of Russian schoolchildren, in particular, trolling techniques, strategies and tactics, through which this form of speech aggression is implemented, are considered and characterized. Among the techniques of provocative behavior most frequently used by schoolchildren on the Internet, one can single out the technique of refuting public opinion through oppositional statements and the technique of getting personal. The main strategy of trolling is the strategy of provocation, which is implemented through various tactics: ridiculing the opponent, tactics of total denial and a sharp change in the behavior of the communicant. Trolling as a form of speech aggression in Internet communication always finds its expression in provocative remarks. According to its linguo-pragmatic status, trolling is a statement based on the potential for conflict. This form of speech aggression is realized as a conflict communicative act that can develop according to several scenarios. Community themes determine the use of provocative remarks within the framework of trolling concerning specific areas of school life. The main goal of network provocateurs is always a communicative conflict. Conclusion. The relevance of the study of speech aggression in the school environment is dictated by the fact that the Internet is by far the most popular communication platform for adolescents. In addition, virtual discourse has become the area where verbal aggression finds its most vivid expression.
Keywords: speech aggression, trolling, provocation, Internet communication, conflict
References:
1. Internet-kommunikatsiya kak novaya rechevaya formatsiya [Internet communication as a new speech formation]. Scientific ed. T. N. Kolokol’tseva, O. V. Lutovinova. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2012. 328 p. (in Russian).
2. Baron R., Richardson D. Agressiya [Aggression]. Saint Petersburg, 2001. 352 p. (in Russian).
3. Enina L. V. Rechevaya agressiya i rechevaya tolerantnost’ v sredstvakh massovoiy informatsii [Speech aggression and speech tolerance in the media]. Rossiyskaya pressa v polikul’turnom obshchestve: tolerantnost’ i mul’tikul’turalizm kak orientiry professional’nogo povedeniya [Russian press in a multicultural society: tolerance and multiculturalism as guidelines for professional behavior]. Moscow, 2002. Pp. 104–110 (in Russian).
4. Buss A. H. The psychology of aggression. NewYork, Willey, 1961. 307 p.
5. Troscheva T. B. Rechevaya agressiya [Speech aggression]. Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Pod redaktsiyey N. M. Kozhinoy [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language. Ed. M. N. Kozhina]. Moscow, 2003. Pp. 340–343 (in Russian).
6. Vorontsova T. A. Trolling i fleyming: rechevaya agressiya v internet-kommunikatsii [Trolling and flaming: speech aggression in Internet communications]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Istoriya i Filologiya – Bulletin of Udmurt University. History and Philology Series, 2016, no. 2, pp. 109–116 (in Russian).
7. Soldatova G. U., Chigar’kova S. V., L’vova E. N. Onlayn-agressiya i podrostki: rezul’taty issledovaniya shkol’nikov Moskvy i Moskovskoy oblasti [Online aggression and adolescents: results of a study of schoolchildren in Moscow and the Moscow region]. Epokha nauki, no. 2017, pp. 103–109 (in Russian).
8. Tretyakova V. S. Konflikt kak fenomen yazyka i rechi [Conflict as a phenomenon of language and speech]. Izvestia Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Izvestiya. Ural Federal University Journal, 2003, no. 27, pp. 143–152 (in Russian).
9. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Ob otnosheniyakh adresata, avtora i teksta v paradigme lingvisticheskogo interpretatsionizma [On the relationship between the addressee, the author and the text in the paradigm of linguistic interpretationism]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2008, no. 1, pp. 144–153 (in Russian).
10. Tretyakova V. S. Konflikt glazami lingvista [Conflict through the eyes of a linguist]. Yurislingvistika-2: russkiy yazyk v yego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii [Jurisingvistics-2: Russian language in its natural and legal existence]. Barnaul, 2000. Pp. 127–140 (in Russian).
11. Vnebrachnykh R. A. Trolling kak forma sotsial’noy agressii v virtual’nykh soobshchestvakh [Trolling as a form of social aggression in virtual communities]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika – Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2012, no. 1, pp. 48–51 (in Russian).
12. Galichkina E. N. Komp’yuternaya kommunikatsiya: lingvisticheskiy status, znakovye sredstva, zhanrovoye prostranstvo. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Computer communication: linguistic status, symbolic means, genre space. Abstract of thesis … doctor of philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2012. 40 p. (in Russian).
13. Lomakin P. A. As’ki, Irki, chaty i drugiye peydzhingovye programmy Interneta [ICQ, IRKI, chats and other Internet paging programs]. Moscow, 2003. 221 p. (in Russian).
14. Sternin I. A. Vvedeniye v rechevoye vozdeystviye [Introduction to speech impact]. Voronezh, 2001. 252 p. (in Russian).
15. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Omsk, 1999. 284 p. (in Russian).
16. Skovorodnikov A. P. O neobkhodimosti razgranicheniya ponyatiy «ritoricheskiy priyom», «stilisticheskaya figura», «rechevaya taktika», «rechevoy zhanr» v praktike terminologicheskoy leksikografii [On the need to differentiate the concepts of “rhetorical device”, “stylistic figure”, “speech tactics”, “speech genre” in the practice of terminological lexicography]. Lingvistika: sbornik statey [Linguistics: collection of articles]. Smolensk, SGPU Publ., 2004. Issue 5. Pp. 5–12 (in Russian).
( 448.08 kB ) 
( 437.79 kB )
Issue: 4, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
Pages: 48 — 56
Downloads: 724