PEDAGOGICAL FACILITATION CREATIVE ABILITIES DEVELOPMENT IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-2-119-125
Introduction. The question of the development of students’ creative abilities through the new phenomenon of facilitation has aroused increased interest on the part of the scientific and practical communities. Facilitation imposes certain requirements on the learning process. Purpose – the requirements provision theoretical analysis of the pedagogical facilitation technology to the teaching mathematics process for the students’ creative abilities development. Material and methods. The research draws on the work of domestic and foreign researchers in the field of general psychology, pedagogical facilitation and the development of creative abilities. The main research methods are study and analysis of psychological and pedagogical literature on the problem, questioning of students. Results and discussion. Pedagogical facilitation imposes such requirements on the learning process as ensuring the importance of learning, psychological security and psychological freedom, as well as the personality of the teacher and his ability to build relationships with students. A meaningful learning involves changing the personality, changing the behavior of the student due to his or her inner sensory-cognitive experience. To fulfill this requirement in teaching mathematics, you can use various facilitation tools in integration with entertaining tasks, non-traditional forms of organizing classes, and demonstrating the teacher’s respect for students. In the process of facilitation, psychological security is achieved by creating an environment that ensures the presence of trust on the part of the student, as well as the absence of fear, anxiety and other negative feelings arising from external evaluation. It is important to organize work with low-performing students, use modern pedagogical technologies to create a situation of success, and increase the level of comfort in the classroom. Psychological freedom presupposes the formation of students’ creativity, their self-expression, in the formation of which it is important to provide an opportunity to show activity, independence, responsibility. Conclusion. The results of the study make it possible to speak about the features of the organization of the educational process with ensuring the importance of learning, psychological safety and psychological freedom of students on the part of the teacher, as well as about the qualities, competence, personality of the teacher-facilitator, which increases the effectiveness of the development of creative abilities through special trusting relationships, recognition and acceptance of the students’ values, optimization of the process of joint work in the mathematics training.
Keywords: creative ability, pedagogical facilitation, significance of teaching, teacher’s personality, psychological safety, psychological freedom
References:
1. Rubinstein S. L. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. 594 p. (in Russian).
2. Vygotsky L. S. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Pedagogical psychology]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2012. 156 p. (in Russian).
3. Druzhinin V. N. Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostey [Psychology of general abilities]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 1999. 368 p. (in Russian).
4. Gumerov I. S. Razvitiye intellektual’nykh tvorcheskikh sposobnostey uchashchikhsya v sisteme nepreryvnogo matematicheskogo obrazovaniya [Development of intellectual creative abilities of students in the system of continuous mathematical education]. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2008, no. 15, pp. 254–262 (in Russian).
5. Maslova E. A. Sushchnost’ i struktura fasilitativnoy napravlennosti lichnosti budushchego pedagoga [The Essence and structure of the facilitation orientation of the future teacher’s personality]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya – Vestnik of Moscow City University. Series «Pedagogy and Psychology», 2011, no. 3, pp. 109–117 (in Russian).
6. Rogers K. Kliyentotsentrirovannyy / chelovekotsentrovannyy podkhod v psikhoterapii [Сlient-сentered / human-centered approach in psychotherapy] (in Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15499903 (accessed 11 August 2020).
7. Rogers C. Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Columbus, OH: Merrill, 1969. 376 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/freedomtolearnv000roge/page/n13/mode/2up (accessed 21 April 2020).
8. Bibler V. S. Kul’tura: dialog kul’tur (opyt opredeleniya) [Culture: dialogue of cultures (the experience of definition)]. Voprosy filosofii, 1989, no. 6, pp. 32–36 (in Russian).
9. Selevko G. K. Traditsionnaya pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya i yeye gumanisticheskaya modernizatsiya [Traditional pedagogical technology and its humanistic modernization]. Moscow, Skol’nyy tekhnologii Publ., 2005. 144 p. (in Russian).
10. Yasnitskaya V. R. Formirovaniye kreativnosti kak professional’no znachimogo kachestva budushchego pedagoga [Formation of creativity as a professionally significant quality of the future teacher]. Kachestvennoye obnovleniye uchebno-vospitatel’nogo protsessa v vysshey i sredney shkole: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh statey. Pod redaktsiyey M. A. Petukhova [Qualitative update of the educational process in higher and secondary schools: Intercollegiate collection of scientific articles. Edited by M. A. Petukhov]. Ulyanovsk, UlSPU Publ., 2001. Pp. 159–161 (in Russian).
11. Rice O. I. Fasilitatsiya kak metod interaktivnogo obucheniya [Facilitation as a method of interactive learning]. Psikhologiya, sotsiologiya i pedagogika – Psychology, Sociology and Pedagogy, 2014, no. 7. URL: http://psychology.snauka.ru/2014/07/3317 (accessed 6 December 2020).
12. Shakhmatova O. N. Pedagogicheskaya fasilitatsiya: osobennosti formirovaniya i razvitiya [Pedagogical facilitation: features of formation and development]. Nauchnyye issledovaniya v obrazovanii – Scientific research in education, 2006, no. 3, pp. 118–125 (in Russian).
13. Blonskyy P. P. Izbrannyye pedagogicheskiye i psikhologicheskiye sochineniya. Tom 2 [Selected pedagogical and psychological works. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1979. 400 p. (in Russian).
14. Semikin V. V. Psikhologicheskaya kul’tura v strukture lichnosti i deyatel’nosti pedagoga [Psychological culture in the structure of the teacher’s personality and activity]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena – Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2003, no. 6, pp. 124–132 (in Russian).
15. Joyce B., Showers B. Student achievement through staff development. VA, ASCD Publ., 2002. 230 p.
( 369.96 kB ) 
( 361.63 kB )
Issue: 2, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: GENERAL ISSUES OF TRAINING AND EDUCATION
Pages: 119 — 124
Downloads: 678