TYPES OF POLITICAL ESSAYS WRITERS AS INFORMATIONAL AND MEDIA LANGUAGE PERSONALITIES
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-9-111-120
Introduction. Researching of different informational and media language personalities is of great interest in connection with intensive role of new information technologies and their influence on thinking, world picture and speech behavior of up-to-date person. The relevance of this study is connected with it. The research points to detection of different types of modern political essays writers. The aim of the article – determination of typical and individual peculiarities of up-to-date political essays writers as informational and media language personalities subject to different models of their speech behavior and reaction to topical informational reasons. Material and methods of research are based on discursive, semantic and stylistic, comparative analysis usage supported by regulative theory as one of communicative stylistic of text trend. Results and discussion. Peculiarities of modern political essays writers as a syncretic information and media language personality with critical thinking, a desire and the ability to prove and argue his opinion, polemic approach in understanding various informational issues relevant for society, strongly pronounced rhetorical competence, a lively media image and a special idiostyle, mainly oriented to nonconformism. The types of modern political essays writers on basis of their speech behavior and aims are revealed. They are the following: 1) hyperrealist (distinguishing capacity of this type is naturalism, factuality, demonstrativity); 2) political essays writer-enlightener (he can be an expert or moral authority, be engaged in educational or enlightening activity); 3) political essays writer-enlightenerromantic (passionate about his own picture of the world, his principles, harmonious, has his own rich experience, positive attitude); 4) political essays writer-enlightener-ideologist (a fanatic-propagandist, faithful to a definite ideology, which he passionately upholds and imposes, builds a dichotomy or antinomy, is paradoxical). Common and individual regulative means, structures and ways of regulativity, which are typical for media discourse of modern political essays writers and for individual discursive practices of media personalities are revealed. Individual peculiarities of political essays writers are the following: difference in intensions, scale of informational reasons for controversy; choice of means and ways of influence on mass audience, availability of author’s regulative means and structures, logical and/or rhetorical argumentation in media discourse. Conclusion. The proposed approach to studying a modern political essays writers’ media discourse from the point of view of typical and individual manifestations of these information and media language personalities revealed that detected types of language personalities which show themselves in speech behavior are different in their aim, means and effect of influence, which is due not only to objective factors, but individual copyright features of these individuals, but individual and author’s peculiarities of these personalities. These findings are of interest for media linguistics, linguistic personology, theory of speech influence, speech conflict study, communicative stylistics of text.
Keywords: media discourse, informational and media language personality, types of informational and media language personalities of political essays writers, communicative stylistics of text, regulative theory
References:
1. Korkonosenko S. G. Publitsistika [Journalism]. In: Duskayeva L. R. (ed.) Medialingvistika v terminakh i ponyatiyakh: slovar’-spravochnik [Media linguistics in terms and notions: dictionary-reference]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2018. Pp. 226–228 (in Russian).
2. Kaminskiy P. P. Printsipy issledovaniya publitsistiki na sovremennom etape [Principals of political essays research in up-to-date period]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal. Philology, 2007, no. 1, pp. 97–105 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsipy-issledovaniya-publitsistiki-na-sovremennom-etape (accessed 16 October 2019).
3. Zagidullina M. V. Publitsistika 2.0: k opredeleniyu ponyatiya [Political essays 2.0: defi nition of notion]. Vestn. Sankt-Peterburgskogo un-ta. Yazyk i literatura – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 2018, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 220–235 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/publitsistika-2-0-k-opredeleniyu-ponyatiya (accessed 16 October 2019).
4. Khasavov A. D. Sotsial’no-antropologicheskiye osobennosti publitsisticheskogo diskursa v kontekste mediynykh kommunikatsiy [Social and anthropological peculiarities of political essays discourse in context of media communication]. Kommunikalogiya – Communicology, 2019, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 67–82 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-antropologicheskie-osobennosti-publitsisticheskogo-diskursa-vkontekste-mediynyh-kommunikatsiy (accessed 16 October 2019).
5. Levitskaya A. A. Mediakompetentnost’ i analiticheskoye myshleniye auditorii: sotsiologicheskiye oprosy poslednikh let [Media competence and analytical thinking of audience: social questioning of last years]. Mediaobrazovaniye – Media education, 2015, no. 1, pp. 30–42 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mediakompetentnost-i-analiticheskoe-myshlenie-auditorii-sotsiologicheskie-oprosy-poslednih-let (accessed 16 October 2019).
6. Bolotnova N. S. Publichnaya yazykovaya lichnost’ i mediasreda: problema rechevogo vozdeystviya [Public language personality and media sphere: the problem of speech infl uence]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, vol. 9, pp. 42–48 (in Russian).
7. Kashirin A. A. Osobennosti individual’nogo mediadiskursa zhurnalista D. Kiseleva (na materiale programmy “Vesti nedeli”) [Features of individual media discourse of journalist D. Kiselev (on the material of program “News of the week”)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, vol. 6 (159), pp. 143–147 (in Russian).
8. Bolotnov A. V. Ispol’zovaniye eksperimental’noy metodiki v analize vozdeystviya publichnoy yazykovoy lichnosti i eye mediatekstov na massovogo adresata [Usage of experimental methods in analysis of public language personality and its media texts infl uence on mass addressee]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2018, vol. 2 (191), pp. 68–74 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-68-74.
9. Bolotnov A. V. Tekstovaya deyatel’nost’ kak otrazheniye kommunikativnogo i kognitivnogo stiley informatsionno-mediynoy yazykovoy lichnosti [Textual activity of informational and media language personality as a refl ection of its communicative and cognitive styles]. Tomsk, Tomsk TsNTI Publ., 2015. 274 p. (in Russian).
10. Sidorov E. V. Problemy rechevoy sistemnosti [Problems of speech system]. Moscow, 1987. 140 p. (in Russian).
11. Bolotnova N. S., Babenko I. I., Baklanova E. A. et al. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: leksicheskaya regulyativnost’ v tekstovoy deyatel’nosti [Communicative stylistics of text: lexical regulativity in textual activity]. Ed. by N. S. Bolotnova. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2011. 631 p. (in Russian).
12. Fedorov A. V., Levitskaya A. A. Blogovaya mediakritika: mediaobrazovatel’naya funktsiya [Media critics in blog: media educational function]. Mediaobrazovaniye – Media education, 2015, no. 1, pp. 43–48 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/blogovaya-mediakritikamediaobrazovatelnaya-funktsiya (accessed 16 October 2019).
13. Nevzorovskiye sredy. 2 yanvarya 2019 g. [Nevzorov’s Wensdays] (in Russian). URL: https://echo.msk.ru/programs/nevsredy/2344503-echo/ (accessed 7 October 2019).
14. Pozner V. Chuvstva solidarnosti u nas voobshche net [We don’t have feeling of solidarity at all]. Pozner Online. 16.10.2019 (in Russian). URL: https://pozneronline.ru/2019/10/26443/ (accessed 16 October 2019).
15. Pozner V. Na moy vzglyad, eto kontrproduktivnaya politika [In my opinion it’s a contrary productive practice]. Pozner Online. 15.10.2019 Interview (in Russian). URL: https://pozneronline.ru/2019/10/26440/ (accessed 16 October 2019).
16. Volkov L. 27 sentyabrya 2018 [The 27-th of September] (in Russian). URL: https://www.facebook.com/leonid.m.volkov/posts/1957388400950450 (accessed 7 October 2019).
17. Pozner V. 1 oktyabrya 2018 g. Gospodin Volkov takim “otchetom” okazyvayet svoyemu shefu medvezh’yu uslugu [Mr. Volkov is doing disservice to his boss by such kind of “report”] (in Russian). URL: https://pozneronline.ru/2018/09/22725/ (accessed 7 October 2019).
18. Pozner V. Vopros ne v tom, skol’ko tebya smotryat, vopros v kachestve [The question is not in how many people watch your show but in the quality]. Pozner Online. 14.10.2019 (in Russian). URL: https://pozneronline.ru/2019/10/26436/ (accessed 16 October 2019).
19. Radzikhovskiy L. Trolling na vysshem urovne. V 2018-m politika okonchatel’no perestala byt’ ser’yeznym delom [Trolling is at top level. Finally politics stopped being serious in 2018] (in Russian). URL: https://www.dp.ru/a/2018/12/25/Trolling_na_visshem_urovne (accessed 16 October 2019).
20. Radzikhovskiy L. P’yesa “Konstitutsiya”. Osnovnoy zakon strany kak postanovka: vsye zavisit ot akterov i rezhissera [The play “Constitution”. The main law of the country as staging: everything depends on actors and director] (in Russian). URL: https://www.dp.ru/a/2018/12/16/Pesa_Konstitucija__Skol (accessed 16 October 2019).
21. Gubin D. Absolyutno tochnyy prognoz na 2019-y i daleye [Absolutely exact prognosis for 2019 and later] (in Russian). URL: https://www.rosbalt.ru/blogs/2019/01/07/1755699.html 1 January 2019 (accessed 16 October 2019).
( 465.67 kB ) 
( 457.92 kB )
Issue: 9, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 9
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF RUSSIAN PHILOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIVE STYLE OF TEXT
Pages: 111 — 120
Downloads: 736