PECULIARITIES OF READERS’ PERCEPTION OF INTERTEXTS IN THE POEMS OF MANDELSTAM
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-11-79-84
Problems of dialogue, regulation of cognitive activity of the reader by means of the text are key to the theory of regulativity developed in Tomsk state pedagogical university, and the theory of intertextuality. The study is performed under the scientific directions. The indicated problem is connected with the highly complex philosophical and linguistic aspects of Mandelstam’s poetry and creativity as its outstanding representative. The creativity of Mandelstam is highly intertextual. The author previously identified five types of lexical regulative models of the intertextual type in it, therefore in this study was conducted an experiment, aimed at identifying their regulatory power. According to indications of language consciousness of the informants, the regulatory power of these structures are influenced by the following linguistic factors: the type of intertexts - respondents noted the key role of pretextual information, of precedent names; the location of intertexts in strong positions (the elements of the pretext of the first poetic stanza); the saturation of the intertextual elements of the poems – the more saturated intertextuality elements of the texts are, the higher their regulatory power. Within the whole text, the models with the minimal amount or the lack of pretextual information have the greatest regulative force, if the saturation coefficient of intertexts is high in the texts themselves. Extra-linguistic factors that affect the regulatory power of the texts include: the level of knowledge of informants; respondents‘ beliefs about their competence in assessing the understanding of the poems; emotional state during the experiment.
Keywords: regularity, intertextuality, intertext, regulative models of the intertextual type
References:
1. Bolotnova N. S. O trekh napravleniyakh kommunikativnoy stilistiki khudozhestvennogo teksta i izuchenii tekstovogo slova [About three directions of communicative stylistics of the art text and studying of the text word]. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskiye aspekty slova v khudozhestvennom tekste [Communicative and pragmatical aspects of the word in the art text]. Tomsk, 2000. Pp. 4–8 (in Russian).
2. Bolotnova N. S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: slovar’-tezaurus [Communicative stylistics of the text: Dictionary thesaurus].Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2008. Pp. 384 (in Russian).
3. Bolotnov A. V. Regulyativnye leksicheskiye struktury kak sredstvo reprezentatsii kontsepta “khaos” v poeme M. Voloshina “Putyami Kaina” (na materiale chastey “Magiya”, “Porokh”, “Par”, “Mashina”) [Regulatory lexical structures as means of representation of a concept “chaos” in M.Voloshin’s poem “in the Ways of Cain” (on material of parts “Magic”, “Gunpowder”, “Steam”, “Car”)]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: “Istoriya. Filologiya” – Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: “History and Philology”, 2008, vol.7, no.2, pp. 22–26 (in Russian).
4. Bochkaryova Yu. E. K voprosu o regulyativnom potentsiale leksicheskikh povtorov raznykh tipov (na materiale liriki M. I. Tsvetaevoy) [To the question about the regulatory potential of lexical repetitions of different types (based on lyrics by M. Tsvetaeva)]. Tekst i yazykovaya lichnost’: materialy V Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (26–27 oktyabrya 2007 g.) [The text and the language personality: the Materials of the V all-Russian scientifi c conference with international participation (26–27 October 2007)]. Under the editorship of professor N. S. Bolotnova. Tomsk, TsNTI Publ., 2007. Pp. 314–320 (in Russian).
5. Kabanina O. L. Eksperimental’noye issledovaniye effekta obmanutogo ozhidaniya kak regulyativnoy dominanty v poeticheskom tekste [Pilot study of effect of the deceived expectations as regulatory dominant in the poetic text]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universtiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, no. 6 (159), pp. 133–137 (in Russian).
6. Karepina L. S. Regulyativnye strategii voploshcheniya obraza adresata v lirike A. Akhmatovoy [Regulative strategies of the addressee image embodiment in the lyric poetry by A. Akhmatova]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, no. 1, (116), pp. 255–259 (in Russian).
7. Fateeva N. A. Intertekst v mire tekstov: Kontrapunkt intertekstual’nosti [The intertext in the world of texts: Counterpoint of intertextuality]. Mosow, KomKniga Publ., 2007. 280 p. (in Russian).
8. Kuz’mina N. A. Intertekst: tema s variatsiyami. Fenomeny kul’tury i yazyka v intertekstual’noy interpretatsii [The intertext: theme and variations. The phenomena of culture and language in intertextual interpretation]. Omsk, Omsk state university Publ., 2009. 228 p. (in Russian).
9. Petrova N. V. Intertekstual’nost’ kak obshchiy mekhanizm tekstoobrazovaniya anglo-amerikanskogo korotkogo rasskaza [Intertextuality as a General mechanism of text formation of the Anglo-American short story]. Irkutsk, IGLU Publ., 2004. 243 p. (in Russian).
10. Stanovkin P. A. Zaglaviya-interteksty v sbornikakh O. E. Mandel’shtama “Kamen’”, “Tristia”, “Stikhi 1921–1925 gg.”, “Novye stikhi (1930–1937) [Title-intertexts in O. E. Mandelstam’s collections “Stone”, “Tristia”, “Poems 1921–1925”, “New poems” (1930–1937)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universtiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2010, no. 6 (96), pp. 73–77 (in Russian).
11. Stanovkin P. A. Regulyativnye modeli intertekstual’nogo tipa v lirike O. E Mandel’shtama [Regulative models of the intertextual type in O. E. Mandelstam’s lyrics]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, no. 1 (116), pp. 260–262 (in Russian).
12. Stanovkin P. A. Spetsifi ka nekotorykh syuzhetov-intertekstov v lirike O. E. Mandel’shtama (na materiale sbornikov “Kamen’”, “Tristia”) [Specifi cs of some plots-intertexts in O. E. Mandelstam’s lyrics (on material of collections “Stone”, “Tristia”)]. Russkaya rechevaya kul’tura i tekst: materialy VI Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (25–27 marta 2010 g.) [Russian speech culture and the text: materials of the VI All-Russian scientifi c conference March 25–27, 2007]. Under the editorship of professor N. S. Bolotnova. Tomsk, TSNTI Publ., 2010, pp. 196–201 (in Russian).
13. Mandel’shtam O. E. Sochineniya. V 2 t. T. 2. Proza [Essays. In 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Prose]. Moscow, 1990. 464 p. (in Russian).
( 443.51 kB ) 
( 437.27 kB )
Issue: 11, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 11
Rubric: COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF THE TEXT
Pages: 79 — 84
Downloads: 818