STUDY OF THE NATURE OF SYMBOLS AND M. M. BAKHTIN’S THEORY OF DIALOGUE IN THE RECEPTION OF CHINESE PHILOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-4-85-95
Introduction. The scientific heritage of the Russian philosopher and culturologist M. M. Bakhtin is a significant and independent object of interpretation in modern humanities. It seems interesting to consider the meanings embedded in the works of the scientist in the aspect of identifying the specifics of their reception on the part of the carriers of a specific national picture of the world. In modern China, there is an expansion of interest in the study of the creative discourse of M. M. Bakhtin, which makes it necessary to try to systematize the accumulated research experience. Aim and objectives. The purpose of the article is to systematize the idea of the key provisions in the interpretation of meanings in the doctrine of symbols and the theory of dialogue by M.M. Bakhtin, contained in the works of Chinese philologists, taking into account the specifics of the national scientific picture of the world and the universal interpretation options that exist in the minds of representatives of the world community. Material and methods. The material of the study was the texts of M.M. Bakhtin as a primary source for the author’s interpretation, as well as scientific sources representing the understanding of the scientific heritage of M. M. Bakhtin in Chinese Humanities. The research methods are textual, comparative analysis, systematization, categorization and generalization of scientific information, introspection. Results and discussion. Generalization of the results of the interpretation of scientific texts by M. M. Bakhtin, available in Chinese humanities today, allows us to identify a certain model of interpretation. It is based on the core of universal meanings that are revealed in the context of the functioning of various and numerous interpretations of Bakhtin’s teachings in modern world science. The category of key universal meanings in the field of interpretation of Bakhtin’s doctrine of signs-symbols includes the interpretation of a sign in relation to the understanding of its meaning in the context of a specific communicative-speech situation. In the theory of dialogue, the majority of world scientists recognize the position of dialogue as a form of deployment of communication of any type, a means of intercultural interaction and the formation of a sense of self-identification. The specifics of understanding the concept of M. M. Bakhtin in Chinese philology consists, first of all, in the desire to combine interpretation options that exist in line with both Western and European science. The core and essence of Bakhtin’s academic thought, according to most researchers from China, is the theory of dialogue, the main goal of which is to emphasize a positive humanistic spirit that upholds individuality and is oriented towards equal participation. Conclusion. The core and essence of Bakhtin’s academic thought, according to most researchers from China, is the theory of dialogue, the main goal of which is to emphasize a positive humanistic spirit that upholds individuality and is oriented towards equal participation. Dialogical thought passes through his linguistic and semiotic thinking. The results of the generalization of the experience of studying the ideas of M. M. Bakhtin by Chinese scientists demonstrate the presence of deep reception in the audience of Chinese philologists in relation to the discourse of the great Russian thinker.
Keywords: scientific heritage of M. M. Bakhtin, the doctrine of signs-symbols, the theory of dialogue, Chinese Bakhtin studies, text
References:
1. Osovsky O. E. Bakhtin v Shankhaye. “Uroki kitayskogo” dlya bakhtinistiki [Bakhtin in Shanghai. “Chinese Lessons” for Bakhtin Studies]. Voprosy literatury, 2019, no. 2, pр. 207‒233 (in Russian).
2. Shaposhnikova I. V. Ipostasi verbal’noy kul’tury: universal’noye v spetsifichnom [Hypostases of verbal culture: the universal in the specific]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2020, no. 1, pp. 199‒215 (in Russian).
3. Chzhao Syuye, Govorukhina Yu. A., Sukhanov V. A. Russkaya literatura v Kitaye: konflikt interpretatsiy, yego prichiny i puti preodoleniya (na materiale retseptsii russkoy literatury kitayskim chitatelem). Stat’ya I [Russian Literature in China: Conflict of Interpretations, Its Causes and Ways to Overcome (Based on the Chinese Reader’s Reception of Russian Literature). Article I]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2021, no. 473, pp. 112‒118. doi: 10.17223/15617793/473/13 (in Russian).
4. Qichao Zhou. Posle i pomimo ponyatiy “polifoniya”, “dialog”, “karnavalizatsiya”. Izucheniye Bakhtina v sovremennom Kitaye [After and in addition to the concepts of “polyphony”, “dialogue”, “carnivalization”. The study of Bakhtin in modern China]. Voprosy literatury, 2015, no. 6, pр. 219‒237 (in Russian).
5. Dubrovskaya S. A. Mezhdunarodnaya Bakhtinskaya konferentsiya v Shankhaye [International Bakhtin Conference in Shanghai]. Regionologiya – Regionology, 2018, vol. 26, no. 1, pр. 179–183 (in Russian). doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.102.026.201801.179-183. URL: https://regionsar.ru/sites/default/files/2018_1/dubrovskaya.pdf?ysclid=l17e2orhoy (accessed 26 March 2022).
6. Bakhtin M. M. Marksizm i filosofiya yazyka: Osnovnyye problemy sotsiologicheskogo metoda v nauke o yazyke [Marxism and the philosophy of language: The main problems of the sociological method in the science of language]. Мoscow, Labirint Publ., 1993. 196 р. (in Russian).
7. Chzhan Bin. Mesto i smysl “Marksizm i filosofiya yazyka” v razvitii dialogizma kruga M. M. Bakhtina ‒ kratkoye izlozheniye soderzhaniya monografii “Izucheniye marksistskoy filosofii yazyka v bakhtinskikh krugakh” [The place and meaning of “Marxism and the Philosophy of Language” in the development of dialogism of the circle of M. M. Bakhtin – a summary of the content of the monograph “The study of the Marxist philosophy of language in Bakhtin’s circles”]. Russkiy yazyk i kul’tura v zerkale perevoda: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii; 13–17 maya, 2016 g., Afiny, Gretsiya [Russian language and culture in the mirror of translation: Proceedings of the VI International Scientific Conference; May 13–17, 2016, Athens, Greece]. Moscow, Maks Press Publ., 2016, no. 1, pр. 613‒625 (in Russian).
8. Bakhtin M. M. Freydizm. Formal’nyy metod v literaturovedenii. Marksizm i filosofiya yazyka: stat’i [Freudianism. Formal method in literary criticism. Marxism and philosophy of language: articles]. Мoscow, Labirint Publ., 2000. 640 р. (in Russian).
9. Bakhtin M. M. Formal’nyy metod v literaturovedenii [Formal method in literary criticism]. Comp. G. Polyak. Ed. K. Kustanovich. New-York, Serebryanyy vek Publ., 1982. 237 р. (in Russian). URL: https://imwerden.de/pdf/bakhtin_formalny_metod_v_literaturoedenii_1982__ocr.pdf?ysclid=l182e43drr (accessed 26 March 2022).
10. Chzhou Tszedun. O lingvisticheskoy teorii Bakhtina [On Bakhtin’s linguistic theory]. Zhurnal Syantanskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2002, vol. 24, no. 1, pр. 89‒92 (in Chinese). URL: https://www.doc88.com/p-8156038683469.html (accessed 28 March 2022).
11. Bay Chzhensyan’. O vklade Bakhtina v semiotiku [On Bakhtin’s contribution to semiotics]. Zhurnal Khunan’skoy biznes-shkoly, 2006, vol. 13, no. 2, pр. 102‒104 (in Chinese). URL: http://www.doc88.com/p-2611699002316.html (accessed 28 March 2022).
12. Rozhkov M. A. Dialog kak samoidentifikatsiya v kul’ture [Dialogue as self-identification in culture]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2010, no. 330, pp. 75‒77 (in Russian).
13. Tszyan Shuchzho, Li Fenlyan. Dialog: teoreticheskiy dukh i printsipy raboty [Dialogue: theoretical spirit and principles of work]. Literaturnoye obozreniye – Literary Review, 2000, no. 1, pр. 128‒130 (in Chinese). URL: http://www.doc88.com/p-5746906760645.html (accessed 28 March 2022).
14. Lyu Kun’yuan’. Prosveshcheniye ot kitaizatsii bakhtinskoy teorii “dialoga” [Enlightenment from the sinicization of Bakhtin’s theory of “dialogue”]. Front sotsial’nykh nauk – Social Science Front, 2006, no. 4, p. 109 (in Chinese). URL: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZX200604017.htm (accessed 28 Msrch 2022).
15. Sya Chzhunsyan’. Bakhtinskaya teoriya karnaval’noy poetiki [Bakhtin’s theory of carnival poetics]. Zhurnal Pekinskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Journal of Beijing Normal University, 1994, no 5, pр. 74‒82 (in Chinese). URL: https://www.docin.com/p-846732762.html (accessed 28 March 2022).
( 860.21 kB ) 
( 844.02 kB )
Issue: 4, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS
Pages: 85 — 95
Downloads: 456