SEMANTICS OF UNREALITY IN THE WORKS OF V. PELEVIN: THE PERCEPTUAL ASPECT
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-1-57-64
Introduction. The article presents the study of the semantics of perception, which is observed in the process of describing unreality as an object of sensory experience in the works of V. Pelevin. Language units with perceptual semantics having a functional and aesthetic meaning play an important role in the implementation of formal and semantic aspects of the organization of a literary text. The purpose of the article is to study the linguistic features of the representation of the semantics of unreality in the work of V. Pelevin on the basis of the identified structural and semantic models of the statement and linguistic means of expressing the semantics of perception. Material and methods. The research is carried out using the method of linguistic modeling aimed at identifying the main components of the utterance structure and linguistic and stylistic analysis. The material chosen is a postmodern text that reflects the active processes taking place in the language sys-tem in particular V. Pelevin’s novels «Chapaev and the Void» and «Generation “P”» which relate to the mature period of the writer’s work (the 1990s). Results and discussion. In the course of the research, it was revealed that the semantics of perception is implemented at various levels of the organization of a literary text. In addition to the basic model of the situation of perception at the structural-semantic level of the utterance, there are models that make it possible to actualize unreal objects. In such circumstances, these objects become accessible to the sensory perception of characters. Abstract and concrete nouns and pronouns are more often used to replace the position of an object. Adjectives and participles that act as qualifiers describe various char-acteristics of the perceived. At the level of the formal text organization, the representation of the se-mantics of the unreal caused the complexity of the syntactic structure of the work (the use of various types of comparative sentences, complex sentences, adverbial clauses of place and adverbial clauses of time, etc.). At the stylistic level of the text, the semantics of unreality are implemented by stylistic devices and expressive means which include language units with perception meaning. Conclusion. The study allows us to conclude that the representation of unreality semantics in the work of V. Pelevin is closely related to the image of perceptual processes. A special role is assigned to perception objects with unusual qualitative characteristics which become the subject of language actualization at different levels of the literary text.
Keywords: unreality, perceptual semantics, linguistic modeling, object of perception
References:
1. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki: sbornik statey. Vypusk 3. Irrealis i irreal’nost’. Pod red. Yu. A. Lander, V. A. Plungyan, A. Yu. Urmanchiyeva [Investigations in the theory of grammar: a collec-tion of articles. Issue 3: Irrealis and unreality. Ed. Yu. A. Lander, V. A. Plungyan, A. Yu. Urmanchiyeva]. Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2004. 476 p. (in Russian).
2. Dreyfel’d O. V. “Irreal’nost” voobrazhayemogo mira geroya i “neklassicheskaya” literatura XX v. [“Irreality” of the imaginary world of the hero and “nonclassical” literature of the twentieth century]. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik – New Philological Bulletin, 2015, no. 2 (33), pp. 44–50 (in Russian).
3. Radbil’ T. V. Yazykovyye anomalii v khudozhestvennom tekste: Andrey Platonov i drugiye [Language anomalies in the literary text: Andrey Platonov and others]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2012. 322 p. (in Russian).
4. Arutyunova N. D. Anomalii i yazyk (k probleme yazykovoy «kartiny mira») [Anomalies and lan-guage (to the problem of the language “picture of the world”]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Topics in the Study of Language, 1987, no. 3, pp. 3–19 (in Russian).
5. Il’inova Ye. Yu. Khudozhestvennyy vymysel i yego kognitivno-zhanrovaya reprezentatsiya [Art fiction and its cognitive-genre representation]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seria 2: Yazykoznaniye – Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 2013, no. 1 (17), pp. 115–120 (in Russian).
6. Sutulina L. G. Metaforicheskaya model’ real’noye–irreal’noye v romane Khusto Navarro «La casa del padre» [Metaphorical model real–unreal in the novel by Justo Navarro “La casa del padre”]. Yazyk. Filologiya. Kul’tura – Language. Philology. Culture, 2015, no. 1, pp. 58–70 (in Russian).
7. Allenova T. Yu. Kategoriya irreal’nogo uzhasnogo i sposoby yeye vyrazheniya v khudozhestvennom prostranstve N. V. Gogolya (na materiale yazyka povestey «Vechera na khutore bliz Dikan’ki» i «Mirgorod». Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The category of the unreal terrible and ways of its expression in the artistic space of N. V. Gogol (based on the language of the stories “Evenings on a farm near Dikanka” and “Mirgorod”. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2000. 22 p. (in Russian).
8. Avdevnina O. Yu. Pertseptivnaya semantika: zakonomernosti formirovaniya i potentsial khudozhestvennoy realizatsii [Perceptual semantics : the regularities of formation and the potential of artistic realization]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 2013. 340 p. (in Russian).
9. Pelevin V. Chapayev i Pustota [Chapaev and Void] (in Russian). URL: http://pelevin.nov.ru/romans/pe-pust/index.html (accessed 12 October 2020).
10. Pelevin V. Generation “P” [Generation “P”] (in Russian). URL: http://pelevin.nov.ru/romans/pe–genp/index.html (accessed 12 October 2020).
11. Kolesnikova A. Yu. Lingvisticheskoye modelirovaniye irreal’nogo v tvorchestve V. Pelevina: pertseptivnyy aspect. Dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic modeling of the unreal in the work of V. Pelevin: perceptual aspect. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2019. 204 p. (in Russian).
12. Konstantinov A. V. Izmenonnyye sostoyaniya soznaniya [Altered states of consciousness]. Bol’shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya. Tom 11 [Big Russian encyclopedia. Vol. 11]. Moscow, 2008. 767 p. (in Russian).
13. Avdevnina O. Yu. Semantika «sostoyaniye V. deystviye» v soderzhanii pertseptivnykh glagolov [Semantics “state V. action” in the content of perceptual verbs]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Filologiya – Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philology, 2012, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 10–18 (in Russian).
14. Bashkova I. V. Grammatika vospriyatiya v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Grammar of perception in modern Russian. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Yekaterinburg, 1995. 24 p. (in Russian).
15. Demeshkina T. A., Verkhoturova N. A., Kryukova L. B., Kurikova N. V. Lingvisticheskoye modelirovaniye situatsii vospriyatiya v regional’nom i obshcherossiyskom diskurse [Linguistic modeling of the situation of perception in regional and Russian national discourse]. Tomsk, Tomsk University Publ., 2006. 194 p. (in Russian).
16. Korychankova S., Kryukova L., Khiznichenko A. Poeticheskaya kartina mira skvoz’ prizmu kategorii pertseptivnosti [Poetic picture of the world through the prism of the category of perceptivity]. Brno, Masaryk University Publ., 2016. 236 p. (in Russian).
17. Kryukova L. B., Khiznichenko A. V., Syaokhuan V. Sub”yekt chuvstvennogo vospriyatiya v semanticheskom prostranstve rasskazov A. P. Chekhova [The subject of sensory perception in the semantic space of A. P. Chekhov’s stories]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2017, no 4, pp. 175–185 (in Russian).
18. Remkhe I. N. Status modeli v lingvisticheskikh naukakh i yeye realizatsiya v kognitivnom modelirovanii yazyka [The status of the model in the linguistic Sciences and its implementation in a cognitive modeling language]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2007, no. 8, pp. 94–98 (in Russian).
19. Beloshapkova V. A. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk [Modern Russian language]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. 800 p. (in Russian).
20. Shmeleva T. V. Semanticheskiy sintaksis. Tekst lektsiy [Semantic syntax. The text of the lectures]. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State University Publ., 1988. 54 p. (in Russian).
( 440.24 kB ) 
( 431.25 kB )
Issue: 1, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF RUSSIAN STUDIES AND COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF THE TEXT
Pages: 57 — 64
Downloads: 561