ABOUT THE CONNECTION OF REGULATIVITY AND REFLECTIVITY IN THE POETIC TEXT: TO THE PROBLEM STATEMENT
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-11-73-78
The article is executed from the positions of the communicative stylistics of the text. It is devoted to the theoretical substantiation of the connection in the poetic (and wider – artistic) text of regulativity and reflectivity. The review of the works of recent years devoted to the study of textual qualities and categories on the material of various discursive practices is presented. The essence of regulativity, reflection, including its types, as well as reflectivity is considered in detail. Regulativity is a systemic textual quality that provides management of the cognitive activity of the addressee. Reflection is interpreted as a universal sign of human thought activity. Reflectivity is a person’s ability to reflection. The reflectivity is closely connected with images of the author and addressee which are realized in the textual categories of subjectivity and addressing. The author relies on the researches of linguists, literary critics, also observations of masters of the artistic word for establishing the connection between the regulativity of the poetic text and the reflectivity. It is found out that from the positions of the communicative-activity approach to the text, the basis of regulativity as a systemic textual quality is reflectivity. Prospects for further research are outlined.
Keywords: categories and qualities of the text, regulativity, reflectivity, poetic text
References:
1. Gal’perin I. R. Tekst kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981. 138 p. (in Russian).
2. Kozlovskaya A. B. Informativnost’ kak osnovnaya kategoriya gazetnykh soobshcheniy [Informativeness as the main category of newspaper reports]. Visnyk Sums’kogo derzhavnogo universytetu – Bulletin of the Sumy State University, 2006, vol. 1, no. 11 (95), pp. 40–47 (in Russian, in Ukrainian).
3. Filatova O. M. Intertekstual’nost’ kak global’naya tekstovaya kategoriya [Intertextuality as the category of the text]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Udmurt University, 2006, no. 5(2), pp. 149–154 (in Russian).
4. Konovalova M. V. Kogerentnost’ i intertekstual’nost’ kak tekstovye kategorii [Coherence and Intertextuality as Text Categories]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2007, no. 8, pp. 21–25 (in Russian).
5. Shelestyuk E. V. Tekstovye kategorii argumentativnosti, suggestivnosti i imperativnosti kak otrazheniye sposobov rechevogo vozdeystviya [Textual Categories of Argumentativeness, Suggestiveness and Imperativeness as the Refl ection of Means of Speech Infl uence]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2008, no. 30 (131), pp. 77–84 (in Russian).
6. Kopytov O. N. O fundamental’nykh kategoriyakh teksta [On the fundamental categories of the text]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Irkutsk State University, 2011, no. 3 (15), pp. 149–157 (in Russian).
7. Valgina N. S. Teoriya teksta [The theory of the text]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2003. 280 p. (in Russian).
8. Bolotnova N. S. Filologicheskiy analiz teksta: ucheb. posobiye [Philological analysis of the text: textbook]. Moscow, Flinta; Nauka Publ., 2009. 520 p. (in Russian).
9. Bolotnova N. S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: slovar’-tezaurus [Communicative stylistics of the text: dictionary-thesaurus]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2008. 384 p. (in Russian).
10. Sidorov E. V. Problemy rechevoy sistemnosti [The Problems of speech system formation]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987, 140 p. (in Russian).
11. Bolotnova N. S. Khudozhestvennyy tekst v kommunikativnom aspekte i kompleksnyy analiz edinits leksicheskogo urovnya [Literary text in communicative aspect and complex analysis of lexical units]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 1992. 312 p. (in Russian).
12. Bolotnova N. S. Teoreticheskiye aspekty izucheniya regulyativnosti v tekstovoy deyatel’nosti [The theoretical aspects of the study of regulatory activity in a text]. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: leksicheskaya regulyativnost’ v tekstovoy deyatel’nost [Communicative stylistics of the text: lexical regulativity in textual activity]. Under the editorship of N. S. Bolotnova. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2011. Pp. 12–42 (in Russian).
13. Petrova N. G. Leksicheskiye regulyativy v aspekte chitatel’skogo vospriyatiya (na materiale poezii K. Bal’monta) [Lexical regulative units in the aspect of reader perception (based on the material of K. Balmont’s poetry)]. Under the editorship of N. S. Bolotnova. Novosibirsk, NSPU Publ., 2015. 168 p. (in Russian).
14. Petrova N. G. Kommunikativnye universalii v poeticheskikh diskursakh K. Bal’monta i I. Severyanina: tochki peresecheniya i razlichiya [Communicative universalities in poetical discourses of K. Balmont and I. Severyanin: cross points and differences]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 9 (150), pp. 40–46 (in Russian).
15. Vorob’eva E. P. Literaturnaya refl eksiya v russkoy postmodernistskoy proze (A. Bitov, Sasha Sokolov, V. Pelevin). Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Literary refl exion in Russian postmodern prose (A. Bitov, Sasha Sokolov, V. Pelevin). Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Barnaul, 2004. 21 p. (in Russian).
16. Stepanov S. Yu., Semenov I. N. Psikhologiya refl eksii: problemy i issledovaniya [Psychology of refl ection: issues and research]. Problemy psikhologii – Problems of Psychology, 1985, no. 3, pp. 31–40 (in Russian).
17. Shumarina M. R. Metayazykovaya refl eksiya v fol’klornom i literaturnom tekste. Avtoref. dis. doct. fi lol. nauk [Metalinguistic refl ection in the folklore and literary text. Abstract of thesis doct. of philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2011. 47 p. (in Russian).
18. Suslova E. V. Refl eksivnost’ v yazyke sovremennoy russkoy poezii: sub’’ektivatsiya i tavtologizatsiya. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Refl ectivity in the language of modern Russian poetry: subjectivization and tautology. Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. St. Petersburg, 2013. 26 p. (in Russian).
19. Mayakovskiy V. V. Kak delat’ stikhi? [How to make poetry?]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1952. 40 p. (in Russian).
20. Bal’mont K. D. Elementarnye slova o simvolicheskoy poezii [Elementary words about symbolic poetry]. Kritika russkogo simvolizma: v 2 t. [Criticism of Russian Symbolism: in 2 vol.]. Moscow, AST: Olimp Publ., 2002. Vol. 1. Pp. 246–267 (in Russian).
21. Petrova N. G. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy “refl eksiv” i “regulyativ” [Discussing the correlation of the notions “refl exive unit” and “regulative unit”]. Sibirskiy fi lologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Philological Journal, 2016, no. 4, pp. 219–227 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17223/18137083/57/19.
( 844.51 kB ) 
( 762.25 kB )
Issue: 11, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 11
Rubric: COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF THE TEXT
Pages: 73 — 78
Downloads: 772