Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 26.07.2025
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №11 EXTRALINGUISTIC BASIS OF EVIDENTIALITY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

EXTRALINGUISTIC BASIS OF EVIDENTIALITY

Grichin Sergey Vladimirovich

Information About Author:

The paper deals with the issue of extra-linguistic factors that determine the properties of language units in scientific discourse in general and the category of evidentiality (in Russian, authorization) in particular. Based on the concept of extralinguistic bases of the scientific style developed within the framework of the functional stylistics, it includes a set of primary and secondary style-forming factors. The author focuses on those of them that determine the functioning of the category of evidentiality in scientific discourse. The main distinctive feature of the cognitive-discursive aspect of considering the extralinguistic bases of scientific discourse is the fact that it allows seeing evidentiality not only as a personal psychological reflection of a subject, but also as marking objective cognitive processes taking place in the scientific text and discourse.

Keywords: evidentiality (authorization), scientific discourse, extralinguistic style-forming factors, epistemic situation, subject of scientific activity

References:

1. Chernyavskaya V. E. Lingvistika teksta: Polikodovost’, intertekstual’nost’, interdiskursivnost’ [Text Linguistics: polycoded character, intertextuality, interdiscursivity]. Moscow, LIBROKOM Publ., 2009. 248 p. (in Russian).

2. Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Stylistic encyclopaedic dictionary]. Moscow, Flinta Nauka Publ., 2006. 696 p. (in Russian).

3. Kozhina M. N. O rechevoy sistemnosti nauchnogo stilya sravnitel’no s nekotorymi drugimi [On the speech systematic character of scientific style compared with some other ones]. Perm University Publ., 972. 395 p. (in Russian).

4. Kozhina M. N. Smyslovaya struktura teksta v aspekte stilistiki nauchnogo teksta [Meaning text structure in the aspect of stylistics of scientific text]. Ocherki istorii nauchnogo stilya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XVIII–XX vv. Vol. 2. Part.1. Stilistika nauchnogo teksta (obshchiye parametry) [Essays on the history of scientific style of Russian literary language of XVIII-XX centuries. Vol. 2, Part 1: The style of scientific text (general parameters)]. Perm, 1996. (in Russian).

5. Karaulov Yu. N. Russkaya yazykovaya lichnost’ i zadachi eye izucheniya [Russian language personality]. Yazyk i lichnost’: sb. statey [Language and personality: Collection of articles]. AN SSSR, In-t rus. yaz. Executive editor D. N. Shmelev. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. 211 p. (in Russian).

6. Shvyrev V. S. Nauchnoye poznaniye kak deyatel’nost’ [Scientific cognition as activity]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1984. 232 p. (in Russian).

7. Zalevskaya A. A. Psikholingvisticheskiy podkhod k analizu yazykovykh yavleniy [Psycholinguistic approach to the analysis of language phenomena]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Linguistic issues, №6, 1999. P. 31 – 42 (in Russian).

8. Kotyurova M. P. Ob ekstralingvisticheskikh osnovaniyakh smyslovoy struktury nauchnogo teksta (funktsional’no-stilisticheskiy aspekt) [On extralinguistic basis of the meaning structure of scientific text (functional stylistic aspect)]. Krasnoyarsk University Publ., 1988. 170 p. (in Russian).

9. Kozhina M. N. Smyslovaya struktura teksta v aspekte stilistiki nauchnogo teksta [Meaning structure of text in the aspect of scientific text]. Ocherki istorii nauchnogo stilya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XVIII–XX vv. T. 2, ch. 1: Stilistika nauchnogo teksta (obshchiye parametry) [Essays on the history of scientific style of Russian literary language of XVIII-XX centuries. Vol. 2. Part 1: The style of scientific text (general parameters)]. Perm, 1996 (in Russian).

10. Bazhenova E. A. Spetsifika smyslovoy struktury nauchnogo teksta i ego kompozitsii [Specifics of meaning structure of scientific text and its composition]. Ocherki istorii nauchnogo stilya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XVIII–XX vv. T. 2, ch. 1: Stilistika nauchnogo teksta (obshchiye parametry) [Essays on the history of scientific style of Russian literary language of XVIII-XX centuries. Vol. 2. Part 1: The style of scientific text (general parameters)]. Perm, 1996 (in Russian).

11. Grichin S. V. Avtorizatsiya v nauchnom stile sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Evidentiality in scientific slyle of the Russian language. Theses of … cand. philol. sci. Tomsk, 2003. 177 p. (in Russian).

12. Shmeleva T. V. Smyslovaya organizatsiya predlozheniya i problema modal’nosti [Meaning structure of a sentence and the problem of modality]. Aktual’nye problemy russkogo sintaksisa – Topical problems of the Russian syntax. Moscow, 1984. P. 78 – 94 (in Russian).

13. Kotyurova M. P. Ekstralingvisticheskiye osnovaniya smyslovoy struktury nauchnogo teksta (funktsional’no-stilisticheskiy aspekt). Diss. dokt. filol. nauk [Extralinguistic basis of the meaning structure of scientific text (functional stylistic aspect). Theses of doct. philol. sci.]. Perm, 1988 (in Russian).

14. Bazhenova E. A. Nauchnyy tekst kak sistema subtekstov. Dis. d-ra filol. nauk [Scientific text as a system of subtexts. Thesis of... doct. philol. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 2001. 366 p. (in Russian).

15. Grichin S. V. Tekstostroitel’naya funktsiya avtorizatsii [Test-building function of evidentiality]. Vestn. Tom. gos. un-ta – Herald of Tomsk State University. Philology. 2010. № 4 (12). P. 5–14 (in Russian).

16. Grichin S. V. Avtorskiy zamysel v aspekte avtorizatsii [Author’s intention in the aspect of evidentiality]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya – The world of Science, Culture and Education, 2013, no. 6 (43), pp. 320–324 (in Russian).

17. Maksimova N. V. «Chuzhaya rech’» kak kommunikativnaya strategiya. Dis. d-ra filol. nauk [“Another’s speech” as communicative strategy. Thesis of … doct. phil. sci.]. Moscow, 2007. 354 p. (in Russian).

18. Paducheva E. V. Semanticheskiye issledovaniya (Semantika vremeni i vida v rus. yaz. Semantika narrativa) [Semantic research (Semantics of time and type in Russian. Semantics of the narrative)]. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1996. 463 p. (in Russian).

19. Kozhina M. N. O dialogichnosti pis’mennoy nauchnoy rechi [On the dialogical character of scientific speech]. Perm State University Publ., 1986. 191 p. (in Russian).

20. Yasnitskiy Yu. G. Leksiko-grammaticheskiye sredstva avtorizatsii v nauchnoy rechi. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Lexical and grammatical means of evidentiality on scientific speech. Thesis of … cand. philol. sci. Moscow, 1984. 188 p. (in Russian).

grichin_s._v._21_26_11_176_2016.pdf ( 394.72 kB ) grichin_s._v._21_26_11_176_2016.zip ( 386.51 kB )

Issue: 11, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 11

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF RUSSIAN STUDIES

Pages: 21 — 26

Downloads: 1078

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU