Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 31.07.2025
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №1 DIRECTIONS FOR MONITORING METHODICAL-MATHEMATICAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

DIRECTIONS FOR MONITORING METHODICAL-MATHEMATICAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Cherednichenko Lyubov Anatolyevna

Information About Author:

The article describes the possible areas of monitoring methodical-mathematical training of future elementary school teachers from the standpoint of implementation of competent approach in vocational education. Provides the analysis of research on the definition of the essence of the concept “monitoring”, on the bases of which were given the specific features of pedagogical monitoring as a system and a process. As a system, monitoring is a set of elements (the purpose of monitoring, the object and the subject of monitoring, monitoring results, monitoring tools, and monitoring activities) that ensure effective implementation of the monitoring procedures. From the standpoint of the procedure approach monitoring can be seen as a consistent implementation of the collection of information on the quality of education, its processing, analysis, assessment in relation to the performance of educational development and the development of further measures to further correction of the educational process. The content of the monitoring activities through the lens of professional competencies, formed in the process of teaching mathematics to students has been revealed. A component structure of competencies has been presented, their components have been revealed – cognitive (what the student must know), active (what the student should be able to do) and personal (what the student should master). The criteria of their formation of future elementary school teachers in the course of mastering the discipline “Methods of teaching mathematics” have been emphasized, and specified the types of assessment tools used for monitoring activities in these areas.

Keywords: pedagogical monitoring, teaching mathematics, professional competence, future elementary school teacher

References:

1. Semina E. A. Monitoring professional’no-profi l’nykh kompetentsey studentov – budushchikh uchiteley matematiki kak sredstvo povysheniya urovnya ikh matematicheskoy podgotovki. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [Monitoring of relevant professional competencies of students – future teachers of mathematics as a means of improving their mathematical training. Dis. cand. ped. sci.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2014. 229 p. (in Russian).

2. Medvedev V. E., Tatur Yu. G. Podgotovka prepodavatelya vysshey shkoly: kompetentnostnyy podkhod [Training higher educational institution teachers: competence approach]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2007, no. 11, pp. 57–61 (in Russian).

3. Tarkhan L. Z. Didakticheskaya kompetentnost’ inzhenera-pedagoga: teoreticheskiye i metodicheskiye aspekty [Didactic competence of the engineer-teacher: theoretical and methodological aspects]. Simferopol’, Krymuchpedgiz Publ., 2008. 424 p. (in Russian).

4. Yataeva E. V. Kharakteristika uchebno-poznavatel’noy kompetentsii v strukture professional’noy kompetentsii prepodavatelya-lingvista [Characteristics of learning and cognitive competencies in the structure of professional competence of the teacher-linguist]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Tyumen state university, 2006, no. 7, pp. 134–138 (in Russian).

5. Cherednichenko L. A. Puti formirovaniya professional’noy kompetentnosti budushchego uchitelya nachal’nykh klassov pri izuchenii distsipliny “Metodika prepodavaniya matematiki” [The ways of formation of professional competence of future elementary school teachers in the study course “Methods of teaching mathematics”]. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk – Actual Problems of the Humanities and the Natural Sciences, 2015, no. 5 (76), part. 2, pp. 136–139 (in Russian).

cherednichenko_l._a._79_82_1_166_2016.pdf ( 393.83 kB ) cherednichenko_l._a._79_82_1_166_2016.zip ( 388.02 kB )

Issue: 1, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 1

Rubric: PROFESSIONAL READINESS OF THE SPECIALIST

Pages: 79 — 82

Downloads: 1140

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU