COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS: LINGUO-COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF SENSE INTERPRETATION OF THE POETIC TEXT
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-6-38-48
Introduction. The study of verbal and cognitive activity of an author and an addressee in the process of co-creation based on the text as a form of communication remains an urgent problem. The modern cognitive-discursive paradigm of scientific knowledge and development of communicative theory of text offer the challenge in the study of text as an object of perception, interpretation and understanding. The aim of the article is the detection of some linguo-cognitive mechanisms of hyperconcept forming as a result of interpretative activity by a subject perceiving the text relying on the regulative theory as one of the directions of the communicative stylistics of the text. Material and methods. The research is examined on the analysis, comparison and generalization of scientific literature on the theory and history of the issue, on the use of the methodology and conceptual and terminological apparatus of the regulative theory, on the application of conceptual, linguistic, semantic and stylistic analysis. The material for the study was the poems of famous Russian poets F. I. Tyutchev, I. A. Bunin, Z. N. Gippius, N. A. Zabolotsky. Results and discussion. The starting point is the following: the interpretation of the text by the addressee depends on linguo-cognitive mechanisms – verbal and cognitive processes that form the generalized meaning of the text (hyperconcept), stimulated by the general system of the text, including the cognitive operations of analysis, comparison, synthesis based on associative activity and an experience of a person. In identifying the hyperconcept, the regulatory strategy of the text, the methods of regulation, the regulatory means and structures which the author used in the text with an orientation towards co-creation with the addressee, “control” of his cognitive activity are important. The lexical system of the text stimulating its associative and semantic deployment in the mind of the reader is especially significant. Interpretive activity presupposes the interconnection of the concepts actualized in the text within the limits of its general conceptual structure based on the relations of complement, enhancement, contrast, inclusion, comparison, generalization. Taking this into account, relying on the regulative theory, the following linguocognitive mechanisms of hyperconcept formation were identified: 1) through amplifying-convergent mechanism, associated with the sequential strengthening of the key concept by various regulatory means and structures in the context of the inductive-deductive lexical macrostructure of the text; with repetition as a way of regulation and a regulatory strategy for the stepwise enhancement of the semantic features of the key concept; 2) closed sequentialadditional, manifested in a phased artistic-figurative concretization of various signs of a hyperconcept based on the use of a strong regulatory strategy of a homogeneous explicit type and repetition as the main way of regulation; 3) comparative-paradoxical, stimulated by the regulatory strategy of the paradoxical-contrastive type; contrast as the main method of regulation and textual paradigms of the antonymic type as a regulatory dominant; 4) comparativesynthesizing, reflecting synthesis (generalization) on the basis of parallel comparative associative-semantic deployment of different facets (features) of the key concept, stimulated by a stepped lexical macrostructure of the inductive-deductive type. Conclusion. The use of the regulative theory and its conceptual and terminological apparatus makes it possible to determine some of the patterns organized by the interpretive activity of the addressee and the linguo-cognitive mechanisms of the formation of the general meaning of the text given in the poetic text. Obtained observations are of interest for further development of the problem of notional interpretation and methods of semantic analysis of the text.
Keywords: communicative stylistics, regulative theory, interpretation, linguo-cognitive mechanism, hyperconcept, poetic text
References:
1. Bogin G. I. Filologicheskaya germenevtika: uchebnoye posobiye [Philological hermeneutics: textbook]. Kalinin, Kalinin State University Publ., 1982. 86 p. (in Russian).
2. Bart R. Smert’ avtora [Death of the author]. In: Bart R. Selected works: semiotics. Poetics. Moscow, 1994. Pp. 384–391 (in Russian).
3. Gadamer H.-G. Tekst i interpretatsiya [Text and interpretation]. Germenevtika i dekonstruktsiya [Hermeneutics and Deconstruction]. Eds. W. Stegmayer, H. Frank, B. V. Markov. Saint Petersburg, 1999. Pp. 243–254 (in Russian).
4. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshleniye i rech’ [Thinking and speaking]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 1999. 352 p. (in Russian).
5. Brudnyy A. A. K probleme ponimaniya teksta [On the problem of understanding the text]. Issledovaniye rechemyslitel’noy deyatel’nosti [Research of speech-thinking activity]. Alma-Ata, 1974. Pp. 80–86 (in Russian).
6. Brudnyy A. A. Psikhologicheskaya germenevtika [Psychological hermeneutics]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 2005. 336 p. (in Russian).
7. Zimnyaya I. A. Psikhologicheskaya skhema smyslovogo vospriyatiya [Psychological scheme of semantic perception]. Smyslovoye vospriyatiye rechevogo soobshcheniya (v usloviyakh massovoy kommunikatsii) [Semantic perception of a speech message (in conditions of mass communication)]. Moscow, 1976. Pp. 5–33 (in Russian).
8. Murzin L. N., Shtern A. S. Tekst i ego vospriyatiye [Text and its perception]. Sverdlovsk, UrFU Publ., 1991. 171 p. (in Russian).
9. Zalevskaya A. A. Tekst i ego ponimaniye [The text and its understanding]. Tver, Tver State University Publ., 2001. 177 p. (in Russian).
10. Pishchal’nikova V. A. Emotsional’naya dominanta teksta: perevodcheskiy aspekt [Emotional dominant of the text: translation aspect]. Emotivnyy kod yazyka i ego realizatsiya [Emotive language code and its implementation]. Volgograd, 2003. Pp. 117–120 (in Russian).
11. Lotman Yu. M. Izbrannye stat’i: V 3 tomakh. Tom 1: Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury [Selected articles: In 3 volumes. Vol. 1: Articles on semiotics and typology of culture]. Tallinn, Alexandra Publ., 1992. 479 p. (in Russian).
12. Gasparov M. L. O russkoy poezii: Analizy, interpretatsii, kharakteristiki [On Russian poetry: Analyzes, interpretations, characteristics]. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2001. 480 p. (in Russian).
13. Dem’yankov V. Z. Kognitivnaya lingvistika kak raznovidnost’ interpretiruyushchego podkhoda [Cognitive linguistics as a kind of interpretive approach]. Voprosy jazykoznanija – Topics in the study of language, 1994, no. 4, pp. 17–33 (in Russian).
14. Dem’yankov V. Z. Transfer idey germenevtiki v kognitivnuyu lingvistiku [Transfer of ideas of hermeneutics into cognitive linguistics]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2018, no. 4, pp. 5–14. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-4-5-14 (in Russian).
15. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Ob otnosheniyakh adresata, avtora i teksta v paradigme lingvisticheskogo interpretatsionizma [On the relationship between addressee, author and text in the paradigm of linguistic interpretationism]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2006, no. 1, pp. 144–153 (in Russian).
16. Boldyrev N. N. Problemy verbal’noy kommunikatsii v kognitivnom aspekte [Problems of verbal communication in the cognitive aspect]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2017, no. 2, pp. 5–14 (in Russian).
17. Boldyrev N. N., Grigor’eva V. S. Kognitivnye dominanty rechevogo vzaimodeystviya [Cognitive dominants of speech interaction]. Voprosy kogniitvnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2018, no. 4, pp. 15–24 (in Russian).
18. Bolotnova N. S. Tipy verbalizovannykh v tekste khudozhestvennykh kontseptov i ikh vzaimodeystviye [Types of artistic concepts verbalized in the text and their interaction]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2005a, no. 3–4, pp. 54–60 (in Russian).
19. Bolotnova N. S. Izucheniye kontseptual’noy struktury khudozhestvennogo teksta v kommunikativnoy stilistike [Study of the conceptual structure of a literary text in a communicative style]. Khudozhestvennyy tekst i yazykovaya lichnost’: materialy IV Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii (27–28 oktyabrya 2005 g.) [Literary text and linguistic personality: Materials of the IV Russian National Scientific Conference (October 27–28, 2005)]. Tomsk, TsNTI Publ., 2005 [b]. Pp. 6–13 (in Russian).
20. Bolotnova N. S. Leksicheskaya regulyativnost’ teksta i ego kontseptosfera [Lexical regulation of the text and its conceptual sphere]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka – Cognitive Studies of Language, 2015, no. XXII, pp. 322–324 (in Russian).
21. Bolotnova N. S. Leksicheskaya struktura poeticheskogo teksta kak klyuch k postizheniyu ego tsennostnykh smyslov [The lexical structure of a poetic text as a key to comprehending its value meanings]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole, 2019, no. 1, pp. 20–25. DOI.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2019-80-1-20-25 (in Russian).
22. Knyazhitskiy A. I. Da zdravstvuyet interpretatsiya! [Long live interpretation!]. Russkaya slovesnost’, 2002, no. 2, pp. 2–8 (in Russian).
23. Bolotnova N. S. Problema obucheniya interpretatsionnoy deyatel’nosti v vuze i shkole [The problem of teaching interpretive activity in the university and school]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik NSU, 2002, no. 1, issue 1, pp. 96–101 (in Russian).
24. Severskaya O. I. Chto zhe khotel skazat’ poet? (Ot dannogo k novomu i noveyshemu v postizhenii obraza) [What did the poet want to say? (From the given to the new and newest in comprehending the image)]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole, 2010, no. 9, pp. 52–57 (in Russian).
25. Baburina M. A. Kontsept “Muza” i ego assotsiativnoye pole v russkoy poezii Serebryanogo veka. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Concept “Muse” and its associative field in Russian poetry of the Silver Age: Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 1998. 20 p. (in Russian).
26. Bespalova O. V. Kontseptosfera poezii N. S. Gumileva v eye leksicheskom predstavlenii. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The conceptual sphere of the poetry of N. S. Gumilyov in her lexical presentation. Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2002. 24 p. (in Russian).
27. Marshina M. V. Leksicheskaya eksplikatsiya kontseptual’noy sistemy F. I. Tyutcheva. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Lexical explication of F. I. Tyutchev. Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. SPb., 2004. 20 p. (in Russian).
28. Feshchenko O. A. Kontsept “Dom” v khudozhestvennoy kartine mira M. I. Tsvetayevoy (na materaile poeticheskikh tekstov). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The concept “House” in the artistic picture of the world of M. I. Tsvetaeva (on the material of poetic texts). Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Novosibirsk, 2005. 22 p. (in Russian).
29. Sergeyeva E. V. Khudozhestvennyy kontsept “Prozrachnost’” v poezii Vyacheslava Ivanova [The artistic concept “Transparency” in the poetry of V. Ivanov]. Khudozhestvennyy tekst: Slovo. Kotsept. Smysl: materialy VIII Vserossiyskogo nauchnogo seminara (21 aprelya 2006 goda) [Fiction text: Word. Concept. Meaning: Proceedings of the VIII Russian National Scientific Seminar (April 21, 2006)]. Tomsk, 2006. Pp. 110–114 (in Russian).
30. Yatsuga T. E. Klyuchevye kontsepty i ikh verbalizatsiya v aspekte regulyativnosti v poeticheskikh tekstakh Z. N. Gippius. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Key concepts and their verbalization in the aspect of regulation in poetic texts by Z. N. Gippius. Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2006. 30 p. (in Russian).
31. Bolotnov A. V. Verbalizatsiya kontsepta khaos v poeticheskom diskurse serebryanogo veka (na materiale tvorchestva M. I. Tsvetayevoy, M. A. Voloshina, O. E. Mandel’shtama) [Verbalization of the concept of chaos in the poetic discourse of the Silver Age (based on the works of M. I. Tsvetayeva, M. A. Voloshin, O. E. Mandelstam)]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2010. 287 p. (in Russian).
32. Proskuryakov M. R. Kontseptual’naya struktura teksta: leksiko-frazeologicheskaya i kompozitsionno-stilisticheskaya ekspl katsiya. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Conceptual structure of the text: lexico-phraseological and compositional-stylistic explication. Abstract of thesis dr. of phil. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2000. 38 p. (in Russian).
33. Churilina L. N. Antropotsentrizm khudozhestvennogo teksta kak printsip organizatsii ego leksicheskoy struktury. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Anthropocentrism of a literary text as a principle of organizing its lexical structure. Abstract of thesis dr. of philol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2003. 39 p. (in Russian).
34. Kabanina O. L. Stsepleniye kak universal’nyy tip vydvizheniya v aspekte regulyativnosti (na primere stikhotvoreniya M. I. Tsvetayevoy “Chto drugim ne nuzhno – nesite mne!”) [Clutch as a universal type of advancement in the aspect of regulation (on the example of M. I. Tsvetaeva’s poem “What others don’t need – bring me!”)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 40–43 (in Russian).
35. Shutova A. V. Kontseptual’nyy analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta kak osnova formirovaniya tekstovoy kompetentsii [Conceptual analysis of literary text as the basis for the formation of textual competence]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 11 (188), pp. 41–45 (in Russian).
36. Shchirova I. A., Goncharova E. A. Mnogomernost’ teksta: ponimaniye i interpretatsiya: uchebnoye posobiye [Multidimensionality of the text: understanding and interpretation: a tutorial]. Saint Petersburg, Knizhnyy dom Publ., 2007. 472 p. (in Russian).
37. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Ocherki po kognitivnoy lingvistike [Essays on Cognitive Linguistics]. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2003. 191 p. (in Russian).
38. Karpenko S. M. Associativnye svyazi slova v uzuse i poeticheskom tekste (na materiale tvorchestva N. S. Gumileva). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Associative connections of the word in the usus and the poetic text (based on the work of N. S. Gumilyov). Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2000. 26 p. (in Russian).
39. Vasil’yeva A. A. Leksicheskiy aspekt assotsiativnogo razvertyvaniya poeticheskikh tekstov O. E. Mandel’shtama. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The lexical aspect of the associative deployment of poetic texts by O. E. Mandelstam. Abstract of thesis cand. of phil. sci.]. Tomsk, 2004. 30 p. (in Russian).
40. Sidorov E. V. Problemy rechevoy sistemnosti [Problems of speech consistency]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 140 p. (in Russian).
( 441.68 kB ) 
( 434.49 kB )
Issue: 6, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
Pages: 38 — 48
Downloads: 532