Bulletin TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 15.04.2021
Home Archive 2018 Year Issue №6 ON THE LEXICAL STRUCTURE INDIVIDUALITY OF POETIC TEXT BY O. E. MANDELSTAM IN HIS ART WORK DYNAMICS
  • Home
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

ON THE LEXICAL STRUCTURE INDIVIDUALITY OF POETIC TEXT BY O. E. MANDELSTAM IN HIS ART WORK DYNAMICS

Shutova A. V.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-6-39-43

Information About Author:

Shutova A. V., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: alyshutova@yandex.ru

The article deals with the concept “Lexical structure of a text” as one of the major notions in functional lexicology and communicative stylistics. In connection with the fact that the basic element of any piece of art is a word, the fundamental element in research of creation of a specific author is identification of peculiarities of the lexical structure of his poetic texts. The analysis made by the author of the article makes it possible to compare the features of the lexical structure of the texts with different creative periods of the author and to identify a certain dynamics. In order to carry out the analysis of the lexical structures of O. E. Mandelstam’s poetic texts based on the periodization of the poet’s work offered by M. L. Gasparov, three most typical, written at different times poems were chosen: relating to the period of early creation “More tender than tender”/ ”Nezhneye nezhnogo” (1909), to the period “Tristia” “The light Moscow rain”/ ”Moskovskiy dozhdik” (1922), to the period of the thirties of the twentieth century “We live with no sense of the country”/” My zhivem, pod soboyu ne chuya strany” (1933). The research found that the lexical structure of poetic texts by O. E. Mandelstam is notable for its wealth and diversity. The poetic texts chosen for the research made it possible to identify various types of their lexical structuring (Depending on the central main point of associative-semantic macro network of the work; depending on the dominance of one of the three types of sense relationship in the framework of lexical microstructures: addition, intensification and contrast; depending on the degree of explicitness / implicitness of dominant lexical microstructure). It is established that the prevalence of defined type of lexical structure in poetic texts by the author correlates with different periods of work of the poet in accordance with evolution of his poetic and linguistic worldview.

Keywords: lexical structure of the text, types of lexical structure, dominant lexical microstructure, poetic picture of the world, O. E. Mandelstam

References:

1. Bolotnova N. S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: slovar’-tezaurus [Communicative stylistics of the text: a thesaurus]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2008. 384 p. (in Russian).

2. Bolotnova N. S. Khudozhestvennyy tekst v kommunikativnom aspekte i kompleksnyy analiz edinits leksicheskogo urovnya [Literary text in the communicative aspect and complex analysis of units of lexical level]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 1992. 312 p. (in Russian).

3. Karpenko S. M. Assotsiativnyye svyazi slova v uzuse i poeticheskom tekste (na materiale tvorchestva N. S. Gumilyova) [Associative connections of the word in usage and poetic text (a case of study of works of art by N. S. Gumilyov]. Tomsk, 2000. 21 p. (in Russian).

4. Kuryanovich A. V. Kommunikativnyye aspekty slova v epistolyarnom diskurse M. I. Tsvetayevoy. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Communicative aspects of the word in epistolary discourse of M. I. Tsvetaeva. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2001. 17 p. (in Russian).

5. Gasparov M. L. Poet i kul’tura. Tri poetiki Osipa Mandelshtama [Poet and culture. Three poetic styles of Osip Mandelstam]. Izbrannyye stat’i [Selected papers]. 1995. Pp. 327–370 (in Russian).

6. Mandel’shtam O. E. Polnoye sobraniye poezii i prozy v odnom tome [A complete collection of poetry and prose in one volume]. Moscow, Al’fakniga Publ., 2017. 1182 p. (in Russian).

7. Mandel’shtam O. E. Sobraniye sochineniy v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1 [The collected works of O. E. Mandel’stam in four volumes. Volume 1]. Moscow, Art-Biznes-Tsentr Publ., 1999. 370 p. (in Russian).

8. Mandel’shtam O. E. Sobraniye sochineniy v chetyrekh tomakh. T. IІ [The collected works of O. E. Mandelstam in four volumes. Volume 2]. Moscow, Art-Biznes-Tsentr Publ., 1999. 610 p. (in Russian).

9. Slovar“ russkikh suffi ksov – lingvisticheskiy sayt Igorya Garshina [Dictionary of Russian suffi xes – linguistic site of Igor Garshin] (in Russian). URL: http://www.slovorod.ru/russian-suffixes.html (accessed 8 May 2018).

10. Mandel’shtam O. E. Sobraniye sochineniy v chetyrekh tomakh. T. IV [The collected works of O. E. Mandelstam in four volumes. Vol. 4]. Moscow, Art-Biznes-Tsentr Publ., 1993. 706 p. (in Russian).

shutova_a._v._39_43_6_195_2018.pdf ( 466.17 kB ) shutova_a._v._39_43_6_195_2018.zip ( 459.76 kB )

Issue: 6, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF THE TEXT: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ASPECTS

Pages: 39 — 43

Downloads: 302

© 2021 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU