Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 02.10.2023
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №12 PSYCHODIDACTIC APPROACH TO TRAINING OF FUTURE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

PSYCHODIDACTIC APPROACH TO TRAINING OF FUTURE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS

Gelfman Emanuila Grigoryevna, Penskaya Yuliya Konstantinovna, Tsymbal Svetlana Nikolaevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-12-100-108

Information About Author:

Gelfman E. G., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: mina.gelfman@yandex.ru Penskaya Yu. K., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: penskaya_julia@mail.ru Tsymbal S. N., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: CmbalSN@tspu.edu.ru

Studies in the field of pedagogy, psychology and techniques of teaching mathematics show that the success of future mathematics teachers largely depends on how much they possess the psychological and pedagogical knowledge of the patterns of students’ mental (intellectual and personal) development they possess and the ability to apply this knowledge. In particular, knowledge of the basics of intellectual upbringing of students can help in solving the problems of modern school mathematics education. Such a problem statement of vocational training of future mathematics teachers involves the organization of training, in which psychological, didactic, methodological and mathematical knowledge is integrated, that is a psychodynamic approach to learning is implemented. The Department of Mathematics, Theory and Methods of Teaching Mathematics of Tomsk State Pedagogical University developed one of the ways for implementing this approach. It includes the development and integration of such disciplines as “Methods of Teaching Mathematics”, “Intellectual Upbringing”, “Modern Models for Teaching Mathematics”, “Developing Technologies in Teaching Mathematics” and other. The integration is carried out through the implementation of the following psychological and pedagogical requirements: the knowledge of conceptual theories of training, foundations of intellectual upbringing in particular; formation of a reflexive experience; formation of text competence; the development of an open cognitive position. The main educational strategy is the project activity strategy through case studies, as well as the extensive use of contextual learning. To implement this strategy, various types of learning activities are used that update the psychological, pedagogical and methodological knowledge of the future mathematics teachers about certain cognitive processes, create conditions for students to learn to identify and compare texts with certain psychodidactic functions, to create the author’s text in accordance with the psychological and pedagogical requirements for modern education.

Keywords: psychodidactics, intellectual upbringing, reflexive experience, text competence, open cognitive position

References:

1. Kholodnaya M. A., Gel’fman E. G. Razvivayushchiye uchebnyye teksty kak sredstvo intellektual’nogo vospitaniya uchashchikhsya [Evolving educational texts as means of intellectual upbringing of students]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology Publ., 2016. 200 p. (in Russian).

2. Grudenov Ya. I. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye osnovy metodiki obucheniya matematike [Psychological and pedagogical basis of the methods of teaching mathematics]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1987. 158 p. (in Russian).

3. Davydov V. V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [The theory of developmental education]. Moscow, INTOR Publ., 1996. 544 p. (in Russian).

4. FGOS VO po napravleniyam bakalavriata [FSES [Federal State Education Standards of higher education in the areas of bachelor’s degree] (in Russian). URL: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfi les/fgosvob/440301.pdf (accessed 11 August 2017).

5. Gel’fman E. G., Kholodnaya M. A. Psikhodidaktika shkol’nogo uchebnika. Intellektual’noye vospitaniye uchashchikhsya [Psycodidactics of the school textbook. Intellectual education of pupils]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2006. 384 p. (in Russian).

6. Penskaya Yu. K. Formirovaniye tekstovoy kompetentnosti budushchikh uchiteley matematiki v protsesse professional’noy podgotovki. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [Formation of text competence of future mathematics teachers in the process of professional training. Diss. cand. of ped. sci.]. Tomsk, 2012. 177 p. (in Russian).

7. Tsymbal S. N. Formirovaniye refl eksivnogo opyta budushchego uchitelya matematiki kak faktor professional’noy kompetentnosti. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [Formation of the refl exive experience of the future teacher of mathematics as a factor of professional competence. Diss. cand. of ped. sci.]. Tomsk, 2007. 210 p. (in Russian).

8. Tsymbal S. N. O nekotorykh putyakh podgotovki budushchego uchitelya matematiki к rabote v psikhologicheski oriyentirovannykh modelyakh obucheniya [On some ways of preparing the future teacher of mathematics for work in psychologically oriented models of learning]. Didaktika matematiki: segodnya i zavtra: мaterialy shkoly-seminara “Masterstvo uchitelya v psikhologicheski oriyentirovannykh modelyakh obucheniya” [Didactics of mathematics: today and tomorrow: The materials of the seminar “Mastery of teachers in psychologically oriented models of learning”]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2001. Pp. 42–47 (in Russian).

9. Kulyutkin Yu. N. Psikhologicheskoye znaniye i uchitel’ [Psychological knowledge and the teacher]. Voprosy psikhologii, 1983, no. 3, pp. 51–61 (in Russian).

10. Luk’yanova M. I. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskaya kompetentnost’ uchitelya: vzglyad na problemy professional’nogo i lichnostnogo rosta [Psychological and pedagogical competence of the teacher: the view on problems of professional and personal growth]. Ul’yanovsk, Ulyanovsk Institute for Advanced Training and Retraining of Educators Publ., 2001. 72 p. (in Russian).

11. Levina M. M. Tekhnologii professional’nogo pedagogicheskogo obrasovaniya: ucheb. posobiye dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedeniy [Technologies of professional teacher education: training manual for students of pedagogical universities]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2001. 272 p. (in Russian).

12. Lipatnikova I. G. Deyatel’nostnoye modul’noye obucheniye studentov pedagogicheskikh vusov v usloviyakh refl eksivnoy deyatel’nosti [Active Module Education of Pedagogical Universities’ Students in Conditions of Refl exive Activity]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2006, vol. 3 (54), pp. 65–69 (in Russian).

13. Gnedenko B. V. O matematike [About mathematics]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2000. 208 p. (in Russian).

14. Tsymbal S. N. Razvitiye otkrytoy poznavatel’noy pozitsii uchitelya matematiki – vazhneysheye usloviye formirovaniya yego professional’noy kompetentnosti [Development of Open Cognitive Position of a Math Teacher is the Main Condition for Forming Its Professional Competence]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2006, vol. 3 (54), pp. 74–79 (in Russian).

15. Bolotnova N. S. Tekstovaya deyatel’nost’ na urokakh russkoy slovesnosti: metodika lingvisticheskogo analiza khudozhestvennogo teksta: metodicheskoye posobiye [Text activities in the lessons of Russian literature: method of linguistic analysis of the literary text: training manual]. Tomsk, UFO-Press Publ., 2002. 64 p. (in Russian).

16. Prishchepa T. A. Razvitiye gotovnosti pedagoga k innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti na osnove obogashchayushchey obrazovatel’noy sredy v sisteme dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [Development of teacher’s readiness for innovative activity on the basis of enriching educational environment in the system of additional vocational education. Diss. cand. of ped. sci.]. Tomsk, 2010. 210 p. (in Russian).

17. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye usloviya razvitiya ponyatiynogo myshleniya [Psycho-pedagogical conditions of the conceptual thinking development]. Comp. E. G. Gelfman, S. N. Tsymbal. Tomsk, TSPU Publ.; TSU Publ., 2003. 240 p. (in Russian).

18. Gelfman E. G., Penskaya Yu. K., Podstrigich A. G., Tsymbal S. N. Teoriya i metodika obucheniya matematike: uchebnoye posobiye [Theory and methodology of teaching mathematics: training manual]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2012. 86 p. (in Russian).

gelfman_e._g._100_108_12_189_2017.pdf ( 467.78 kB ) gelfman_e._g._100_108_12_189_2017.zip ( 460.58 kB )

Issue: 12, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 12

Rubric: TEACHER TRAINING AT UNIVERSITY

Pages: 100 — 108

Downloads: 625

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU