SOCIAL CAUSALITY OF FORMATION OF THE MODERN PEDAGOGICAL FRAMEWORK OF CATEGORIES AND CONCEPTS
In this article we emphasize the necessity of paying attention to foreign pedagogical terms as a clue factor in understanding international experience in science and education. The article considers the influence of social and historical factors on development of modern educational terminology. As an illustration of theoretical reasoning the article demonstrates some examples of borrowed general pedagogical terms and their equivalents in the Russian language. It also analyzes the problem of interpretation and implementation of the borrowed terms in the domestic pedagogy and highlights the need to adapt foreign pedagogical terminology to the peculiarities of domestic pedagogy and realities of the Russian educational system.
Keywords: educational terminology, borrowed terms, education system, social and historical factors
References:
1. Ryzhov A. N. Genezis pedagogicheskikh ponyatiy v Rossii v XI–XX vv. [The genesis of pedagogical notions in Russia in the XI–XX centuries: monograph]. Moscow, Prometey Publ., 2012. 300 p. (in Russian).
2. Kobeleva E. P. K voprosu o povyshenii effektivnosti kontekstnoy inoyazychnoy podgotovki ekonomistov v sisteme otraslevogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya [To the problem of increasing effi ciency of context foreign language teaching of students specializing in economics in the system of professional training]. Pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2014, vol. 3 (5), pp. 19–24 (in Russian). URL: http://npo.tspu.edu.ru/archive.html (accessed 21.08.2016).
3. Grinev S. V. Vvedeniye v terminografi yu [Introduction into terminography]. Moscow, MPU Publ., 1995. 158 p. (in Russian).
4. Vey L. D. Enhancing the relationship between learning and assessment: Thesis for the degree of doctorate of education. University of Canberra, 2005. 280 p.
5. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D. Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 2004, no. 86 (1), pp. 8–21.
6. Koshkina E. A. Pedagogicheskaya terminologiya kak ob’’ekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya [Pedagogical terminology as an object of crossdisciplinary research]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2010, no. 339, pp. 155–160 (in Russian).
7. Verkhozina A. V. T’yutor kak pedagogicheskaya spetsial’nost’ v sisteme professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Tutor as a pedagogical specialty in system of vocational education]. Vestnik Shadrinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Vestnik ShGPU, 2015, no. 2 (26), pp. 133–136 (in Russian).
8. Kvalifi katsionnye kharakteristiki dolzhnostey rabotnikov obrazovaniya (razdel Edinogo kvalifi katsionnogo spravochnika dolzhnostey rukovoditeley, spetsialistov i sluzhashchikh): sbornik normativnykh pravovykh aktov s kommentariyami [The qualifi cation characteristics of workers of education (section of the Unifi ed qualifi cation directory of managers, specialists and employees)]. Ed. V. N. Ponkratova, Zh. P. Osiptsova]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo MISIS Publ., 2009. 94 p. (in Russian).
9. Kokambo Yu. D., Skorobogatova O.V. T’yutorstvo kak novaya forma vzaimodeystviya uchastnikov obrazovatel’nogo protsessa [Tutoring as a new form of interaction of the participants of the educational process]. Vestnik Amurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Herald of Amur state university, 2013, no. 60: ser.: Humanities. pp. 110–115 (in Russian).
10. Kharina N. V. Professional’noye obrazovaniye v Rossii: problemy, puti resheniya [Professional education in Russia: problems and solutions]. Pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2013, vol. 1 (1), pp. 8–15 (in Russian).
( 409.06 kB ) 
( 403.29 kB )
Issue: 12, 2016
Series of issue: Issue 12
Rubric: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Pages: 165 — 168
Downloads: 676