Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.12.2023
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №11 REPETITION AS AN EXPRESSIVE MEANS OF THE LITERARY WORK LANGUAGE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

REPETITION AS AN EXPRESSIVE MEANS OF THE LITERARY WORK LANGUAGE

Gatsalova Larisa Borisovna, Parsieva Larisa Kasbulatovna

Information About Author:

The article considers repetition in language as one of the most prominent means of expression in formation of individual style of fictional work’s author. On the example of Ossetian writers’ works it is convincingly proved that repetition is not only one of the means of organizing retrospection and prospection in the text, but also a way of expressing subjective modality. Aesthetic and expressive effect of repetition increases considerably during the use of different kinds of duplication: phonetic-phonological, lexical, morphemic and morphological, semantic and syntactic. The type of repetitions and their functional yield are directly dependent on the genre varieties of fiction text. In the author’s narrative reasoning text they mainly perform modal-expressive function, and in the descriptive texts they express author’s subjective attitude to the displayed.

Keywords: the Ossetian language, linguistic repetition, linguistic text analysis, language of fiction, fictional text

References:

1. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of written word]. Sost. S. G. Bocharov, primech. S. S. Averintsev i S. G. Bocharov. M.: Iskusstvo Publ., 1979. (in Russian).

2. Kulikova Z. P. Povtor kak sredstvo ekspressivnosti i garmonizatsii poeticheskikh tekstov M. Tsvetaevoy i R. M. Ril’ke. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Repetition as a mean of expression and harmonization of M. Tsvetaeva’s and R. M. Rilke’s poetic texts. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2007, 19 p. (in Russian).

3. Raznoglyadova N. V. Povtor kak kategoriya khudozhestvennogo teksta v neblizkorodstvennykh yazykakh (na materiale proizvedeniy T. Manna i ikh russkikh perevodov): Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Repetition as a category of fictional text in non-cognate languages (on the material of Th. Mann’s works and their translations into Russian). Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Saratov, 1998, 16 p. (in Russian).

4. Savchenko L. I. Povtor kak stilisticheskaya kategoriya v khudozhestvennoy proze F. M. Dostoevskogo: Dis…. kand. filol. nauk [Repetition as a stylistic category in Dostoyevsky’s fictional prose. Thisis cand. philol. sci.]. Tashkent, 1984. 203 p. (in Russian).

5. Khugaev S. Z. Narty Farnæg [Narts’ Farnag]. Narty Farnæg: roman, radzyrdtæ. – Dzæudzhyhæu: Ir, 2005. pp. 5–335 (in Ossetian).

6. Khugaev I. S. Izgoy [Outcast]. Dar’yal, 2011, no.3, pp. 14–51 (in Russian).

7. Hugaev I. S. Verigi voli: kniga stihov i stihij [Chains of will: book of verses and elements]. Vladikavkaz: Ir, 2013 (in Russian).

8. Shtayn K. E. Garmoniya poeticheskogo teksta: Sklad. Tkan’. Faktura [Harmonization of poetic texts: Constitution. Structure. Texture]. Stavropol’: SGU Publ., 2006. 646 p. (in Russian).

9. Dobizha O. A. Leksiko-grammaticheskiy povtor kak sredstvo vyrazheniya kategoriy kolichestva i stepeni (na materiale sovremennogo russkogo yazyka): Dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Lexico-grammatical repetition as a means of expression of categories of quality and degree (on the material of the modern Russian language). Thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Taganrog, 2001. 195 p. (in Russian).

10. Gatsalova L. B., Parsieva L. K. Leksikograficheskaya reprezentatsiya kontsepta «Fændag» («Doroga») v osetinskom yazyke [The lexicographical representation of the concept «Faendag» («Road») in the Ossetian language]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. Modern problems of science and education, 2012, no. 5, pp. 301 (in Russian).

gatsalova_l._b._101_104_11_176_2016.pdf ( 420.68 kB ) gatsalova_l._b._101_104_11_176_2016.zip ( 412.76 kB )

Issue: 11, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 11

Rubric: LINGUISTICS

Pages: 101 — 104

Downloads: 547

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU