Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 17.08.2022
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №11 ON THE ETHNOCULTURAL BACKGROUND OF THE PLANT NAMES MOTIVATED BY THEIR HABITAT (BASED ON RUSSIAN AND GERMAN DATA)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

ON THE ETHNOCULTURAL BACKGROUND OF THE PLANT NAMES MOTIVATED BY THEIR HABITAT (BASED ON RUSSIAN AND GERMAN DATA)

Yurchenkova E. Y.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the plant names motivated by their habitat. The study relies on regional and common names that belong to Russian and German traditional nomenclatures of plants and derive from animal names by a metonymic transfer. The author reveals common and particular bases of such transfer. First of all, the transfer may take place in both Russian and German if habitat of a plant concurs with habitat of an animal. Such correlation implies seven coincident habitats. Five of them are common in Russian and German. They are 1) woods, 2) fields and meadows, 3) waters, 4) marshes and 5) shadow places. The one habitat specific in Russian is steppe; the one specific in German is rocks and mountains. The other common bases of metonymic transfer are ‘habitat of a plant concurs with shelter of an animal, and concurs with a place animal usually prefers to stay or visit. To the specific German bases belong the following two: habitat of a plant concurs with pasture of an animal; and habitat of a plant concurs with a place for animal to breed. Another aim of the article is to show how important the ethnocultural background is for plants’ nomination. Common symbolism in Russian and German ethnocultures have such animals and birds like wolf, bear, deer, hare, snake, frog, toad, duck, swan and crane. That is the reason plants with similar habitat have similar names in both languages. Different ethnocultural meaning have elk, woodpecker, raven, crow and magpie (in Russian); as well as chamois, fox, cuckoo, stork, swine, cow, sheep and goat (in German).

Keywords: nomination, habitat, metonymic transfer, plant name, animal name, ethnoculture, the traditional nomenclature of plants

References:

1. Slavyanskiye drevnosti: Etnolingvisticheskiy slovar’ [Slavic Antiquities: An Ethnolinguistic Dictionary]. Tolstoy N. I. (Ed.). Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (The Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences), Vol. 1, 1995. 578 p.; Vol. 2, 1999. 697 p.; Vol. 3, 2004. 697 p. (in Russian).

2. Handwörterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens [Pocket Lexicon of German Superstition]. Hoffmann-Krayer E., Bächtold-Stäubli H. (Eds.). Berlin, Leipzig, Walter de Gruyter & Co, Vol. 2, 1929–1930. 1778 p.; Vol. 3, 1930–1931. 1920 p.; Vol. 5, 1932–1933. 1872 p.; Vol. 7, 1935–1936. 1712 p.; Vol. 8, 1936–1937. 1762 p.

3. Moiseeva E. Yu. Otrazheniye narodnykh predstavleniy o zhivotnom mire v naimenovaniyakh yagod (na materiale russkogo i nemetskogo yazykov) [Berry Names as a Reflection of the Folk Notions of Animal World (Based on Russian and German Data)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, no. 10 (163), pp. 62–68 (in Russian).

4. Gura A. V. Simvolika zhivotnykh v slavyanskoy narodnoy traditsii [The Symbolism of Animals in Slavic Folk Tradition]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 1997. 912 p. (in Russian).

5. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov [Dialectal Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Sankt-Petersburg, Nauka Publ., Vol. 6, 1970. 358 p.; Vol. 8, 1972. 369 p.; Vol. 10, 1974. 388 p.; Vol. 40, 2006. 347 p. (in Russian).

6. Merkulova V. A. Ocherki po russkoy narodnoy nomenklature rasteniy [Essays on Russian Folk Nomenclature of Plants]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967. 260 p. (in Russian).

7. Marzell H. Die Tiere in deutschen Pflanzennamen: Ein botanischer Beitrag zum deutschen Sprachschatze [Animals in German Plant Names: A Botanical Contribution to German Vocabulary]. Heidelberg, Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1913. 235 p.

8. Sauerhoff F. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Pflanzennamen: Die Herkunft der wissenschaftlichen, deutschen, englischen und französischen Namen [An Etymological Dictionary of Plant Names: The Origin of Scientific, German, English and French Names]. Stuttgart, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2003. 779 p.

yurchenkova_e._y._95_100_11_176_2016.pdf ( 464.71 kB ) yurchenkova_e._y._95_100_11_176_2016.zip ( 454.84 kB )

Issue: 11, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 11

Rubric: LINGUISTICS

Pages: 95 — 100

Downloads: 428

For citation:


© 2022 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU