Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 01.04.2023
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №6 THE DEFINITION OF CHILD ABUSE IN THE FAMILY: THE VALUE CONTEXT
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE DEFINITION OF CHILD ABUSE IN THE FAMILY: THE VALUE CONTEXT

Smyk Julia Victorovna

Information About Author:

The article discusses a topical problem of child abuse in the family. The author identifies two approaches to the definition of the concept on the basis of theoretical analysis. A representative of the first approach uses external evaluation criteria of child abuse. This concept can be identified with some forms of violence and cruelty. A representative of the second approach uses criteria reflecting the intrinsic characteristics of the phenomenon. They concretize the psychological content of the concept. The author uses a value approach to the definition of child abuse in the family. The author defines child abuse in the family as a violation (reduction) of the parent of the valuable relation to the child as an individual.

Keywords: child abuse, value, value approach, the value of the child in the family

References:

1. Smyk Yu. V. Semeynye faktory podrostkovoy agressivnosti: issledovaniye fenomena zhestokogo obrashcheniya s det’mi [Family factors of adolescent aggression: a study of the phenomenon of child abuse]. Irkutsk, Izdatel’stvo Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ., 2009. 191 р. (in Russian).

2. Rybnikov V. Yu., Parfenov Yu. A. Psikhologicheskiy status lichnosti podrostkov, podvergshikhsya zhestokomu obrashcheniyu v sem’e [Personality adolescents of the abused in the family]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universitetata – TSPU Bulletin, 2012, vol. 6 (121), рр. 148–151 (in Russian).

3. Ilgamov E. Z. Fenomen semeynogo nasiliya v otnoshenii detey [The phenomenon of domestic violence against children]. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universitetata – Kazan Technological University Bulletin, 2011, vol. 1, рр. 280–292 (in Russian).

4. Ochirova A. V. Zhestokoe obrashcheniye s det’mi v sem’e: k probleme opredeleniya ponyatiy [Child abuse in the family: the problem of defi nitions]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta – St. Petersburg University Bulletin, 2003, vol. 6, no. 4 (30), рр. 91–99 (in Russian).

5. Zhuravleva T. M., Safonova T. Ya., Tsymbal E. I. Pomoshch’ detyam – zhertvam nasiliya [Help the children – victims of violence]. Мoscow, Genezis Publ., 2006. 112 р. (in Russian).

6. Guseynov A. A. Ponyatiya nasiliya i nenasiliya [Concepts of violence and non-violence]. Voprosy fi losofi i – Questions of рhilosophy, 1994, no. 6, рр. 35–41 (in Russian).

7. Byutner K. Zhit’ s agressivnymi det’mi [Live with aggressive children]. Мoscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1991. 144 р. (in Russian).

8. Siratov V. A. Nasilie i nenasilie [Violence and Nonviolence]. Entsiklopediya gumanitarnykh nauk – Encyclopedia of humanitarian sciences, 2005, no. 1, рр. 135–139 (in Russian).

9. Bratchenko S. L. Gumanisticheskaya psikhologiya kak odno iz napravleniy dvizheniya za nenasilie [Humanistic psychology as one of the directions of the movement for non-violence]. St. Peterburg, Sankt-Peterburgskoе obshchestvo Yanusha Korchaka Publ., 1999. 51 р. (in Russian).

10. Ratinov A. R., Mikhaylova O. Yu. Zhestokost’ kak pravovaya i nravstvenno-psikhologicheskaya problema [Violence as a legal and moral-psychological problem]. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya [Legal psychology]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2001. Pр. 159–171 (in Russian).

11. Kir’yakova A. V. Teoriya orientatsii lichnosti v mire tsennostey [Theory of orientations of the person in the world of values]. Orenburg, 1996. 188 р. (in Russian).

12. Kuznetsova E. G. Lichnostnye tsennosti: ponyatie, podkhody i klassifi katsii [Personal values: defi nition, approaches and classifi cation]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Orenburg State University Bulletin, 2010, no. 10 (116), рр. 20–24 (in Russian).

13. Semenova E. A. Aksiologicheskaya psikhologiya [Axiological psychology]. Irkutsk, Vostochno-Sibirskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya obrazovaniya Publ., 2013. 128 р. (in Russian).

smyk_j._v._38_42_6_159_2015.pdf ( 461.75 kB ) smyk_j._v._38_42_6_159_2015.zip ( 455.32 kB )

Issue: 6, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: PSYCHOLOGY

Pages: 38 — 42

Downloads: 603

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU