Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.12.2023
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №10 EKPHRASIS AND ITS INTERPRETATION IN TED HUGHES’S POEM “PORTRAITS”
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru
edujournal.tspu.edu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

EKPHRASIS AND ITS INTERPRETATION IN TED HUGHES’S POEM “PORTRAITS”

Karpukhina Tamara Petrovna

Information About Author:

The article is focused on ekphrasis serving as a term to designate verbal representation of a work of fine arts in literature. Ekphrasis is analysed as presented in the poem “Portraits” written by the famous English poet Ted Hughes. Specific features of ekphrasis and various linguistic means of its manifestation are subjected to analysis. A dialogic form of ekphrasis is employed in the poem. The main features embedded in the archetypal scheme of an ekphrastic dialogue are revealed in the poem under analysis. The mysterious message sent by the portrait of the heroine with the doppelganger in the background is deciphered not by the artist as the connoisseur and the interpreter, but by the poet whose role is that of a naпve listener.

Keywords: English poetry, Ted Hughes, “Portraits”, fine arts, ekphrasis, ekphrastic dialogue, the archetypal scheme, an image coming to life, mysterious message of the picture, the motif of a doppelganger

References:

1. Braginskaya N. V. Ekphrasis as a type of the text (structural classifi cation). Slavonic and Balkan Linguistics. Karpato-Eastern and Slavonic Parallels. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. Pp. 259–283 (in Russian).

2. Braginskaya N. V. “The Pictures“ by Philostrates Senior: genesis and structure of the dialogue before the picture. Odyssey. Man in history: The image of the world in national and scientifi c thought. Russian Academy of Sciences, the Institute of History. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. Pp. 274–313 (in Russian).

3. Geller L. Revival of the Concept, or the Word about Ekphrasis. Ekphrasis in Russian literature: Proceedings of the Lozanna symposium. Ed. by L. Geller. Moscow, MIK Publ., 2002. Pp. 5–23 (in Russian).

4. Tret’yakov E. N. Ekphrasis as matrix-making representation of iconic signs. Abstract of thesis candidate of philol. sci. Tver’, 2009. 19 p. (in Russian).

5. Tokarev D. V. International scientifi c conference “Picture and Word: forms of ekphrasis in literature“. Russian Literature, 2009, no. 1 (in Russian).

6. Ekphrasis in Russian literature: Proceedings of the Lozanna symposium. Ed. by L. Geller. Moscow, MIK Publ., 2002. 216 p. (in Russian).

7. Rubens M. Ekphrasis in Georgiy Ivanov’s early lyrics. Russian Literature, 2003, no. 3, pp. 68–85 (in Russian).

8. Shatin Yu. V. Revived pictures: ekphrasis and diagesis. Critics and Semiotics. Issue 7. Novosibirsk, 2004. Pp. 217–226 (in Russian).

9. Khadynskaya A. A. Ekphrasis as a means of expressing pastorality in Georgiy Ivanov’s early lyrics. Abstract of thesis of candidate of philol. sci. Tyumen’, 2004. 22 p. (in Russian).

10. Khaninova R. M. Ekphrasis as a dream and «erevived» ekphrasis in A. K. Tolstoy’s prose of 1910–1920-s. Volgograd State Pedagogical University News. Philological Sciences, 2008, no. 10 (54), pp. 150–156 (in Russia).

11. Krivoruchko A. Yu. Functions of ekphrasis in Russian prose of 1920-s. Abstract of thesis candidate of philol. sci. Tver’, 2009. 18 p. (in Russian).

12. Gryakalova N. Yu. Visual image and message: Notes on Chekhov’s ekphrasis. Russian literature, 2010, no. 6 (in Russian).

13. Khaynadi Z. Painting by means of a word. Poetic function of visual images in Leo Tolstoy’s works. Issues of Literature, 2010, no. 12 (in Russian).

14. Samsonova I. V., Seropyan A. S. Basics of Russian ekphrasis. Moscow State Regional University Bulletin. Russian Philology, 2011, no. 3, pp. 129–135 (in Russian).

15. Poddubtsev R. Ekphrasis in Andrey Platonov’s works: Poetics of visuality. Issues of Literature, 2011, no. 10, pp. 173–196 (in Russian).

16. Yatsenko E. V. “Do like pictures, poets…”. Ekphrasis as an artistic and a ideological model. Issues of Philosophy, 2011, no. 11 (in Russian).

17. Yatsenko E. V. Ekphrasis in West European culture as projected by K. M. Kantor. Issues of Philosophy, 2012, no. 12, pp. 55–57 (in Russian).

18. Krivonos V. Sh. “Dead Souls” by Gogol: Portrayal of man. Russian Academy of Science News, 2012, no. 2 (in Russian).

19. Vasilyev S. A. Pushkin’s “Madonna”. Russian speech, 2013, no. 10 (in Russian).

20. Bulkina I. Word and picture. XX-th Lotman Readings. New Literature Review, 2013, no. 6 (in Russian).

21. Lotman Yu.M. On poets and poetry. Analysis of a poetical text. Articles and research. Notes. Reviews. Performances. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo – SPb Publ., 2001. 848 p. (in Russian).

22. Uspenskiy B. A. Poetics of composition. St. Petersburg., Azbuka Publ., 2000. 352 p. (in Russian).

23. Karpukhina T. P. Morphemic repetition in artistic prose in the light of the theory of aesthetic game. Khabarovsk, DVGGU Publ., 2006. 392 p. (in Russian).

24. Karpukhina T. P. Aesthetic aspects of the interrelation of morphemic repetition and syntactical parallelism in English artistic prose. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 2 (130), pp. 216–222 (in Russia).

25. Karpukhina T. P. The effect of defeated expectancy created by the interrelation of morphemic repetition and syntactical parallelism in English artistic prose. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 3 (131), pp. 22–27 (in Russia).

26. Karpukhina T. P. Interrelation of morphemic repetition and syntactical parallelism in English artistic prose. Voronezh State University Bulletin, 2013, no. 2, pp. 36–41 (in Russian).

27. Dictionary of foreign words. Moscow, Slovary Publ., 1949. 801 p. (in Russian).

karpukhina_t._p._16_23_10_151_2014.pdf ( 474.4 kB ) karpukhina_t._p._16_23_10_151_2014.zip ( 467.53 kB )

Issue: 10, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: GERMANIC AND ROMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 16 — 23

Downloads: 750

For citation:


© 2023 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU